Which is Better for Protein Imaging: Phase Contrast TEM or Annular Dark Field STEM?

Abstract

In a landmark paper Henderson compared X-ray, neutrons and electrons for protein structure determination. He showed that electron microscopy should be superior to X-ray or neutron diffraction in terms of dose for a given resolution. in addition he presented a theoretical analysis to determine the smallest size molecule whose structure could be determined by phase contrast microscopy. Although he qualitatively considered amplitude contrast mechanisms and concluded they were inferior to phase contrast, no explicit numerical analysis was performed. It has been implicitly assumed that bright field phase contrast imaging is the optimal technique for imaging small biological molecules. Protein specimens are usually embedded in some medium such as ice or glucose. Since they must give a very low contrast it seems reasonable to expect that bright field techniques for these weakly scattering objects would be inferior, given that a weak signal is sitting on large background.