Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:05:45.649Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Variations in the Probe Beam Broadening with Operating Conditions in ESEM: Monte-Carlo Simulations and Edx Measurements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

I. C. Bache
Affiliation:
Polymers & Colloids Group, Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge University, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 OHE
S. Kitching
Affiliation:
Polymers & Colloids Group, Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge University, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 OHE
B. L. Thiel
Affiliation:
Polymers & Colloids Group, Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge University, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 OHE
A. M. Donald
Affiliation:
Polymers & Colloids Group, Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge University, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 OHE
Get access

Extract

An understanding of the scattering of an electron beam as it passes through a volume of low pressure gas is of critical importance for users of Low Vacuum and Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopes (LV-SEM & ESEM respectively) The ‘skirting’ of the primary beam as a result of scattering is of particular importance in X-ray microanalysis where scattered electrons, falling onto the sample away from the probe beam, can adversely affect the spatial resolution of the X-ray signal. A number of studies have attempted to quantify the width of the probe beam experimentally and hence determine optimum microscope operating parameters. Theoretical and computational work modelling the interactions of the beam with the gas have suggested that the shape of the probe beam can be modelled by some form of Gaussian. Experimental measurements, however, suggest that the probe has a skirted form rather than a Gaussian one.

Type
Environmental SEM
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Griffin, B. J., et al., Microbeam Analysis (1995) 383Google Scholar
2.Bower, N. W., et al., Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 348 (1993) 40210.1007/BF00323143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Gilpin, C. and Sigee, D. C., Journal of Microscopy 179 (1995) 2210.1111/j.1365-2818.1995.tb03610.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Thiel, B. L., et al., to be published in J. Microsc. (1997)Google Scholar
5.The authors would like to thank the BBSRC and the DTI Colloid Technology Programme for funding, and Mr. Andrew Eddy for technical supportGoogle Scholar