No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Truly Quantitative EELS Imaging - Let’s Not Settle For Just Pretty Pictures Anymore
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 July 2020
Abstract
The term “quantitative“ means many things to many people. in imaging its value is often discounted to mean only that a more intense region can be said to have more of what is being measured than a less intense region. Others may be more stringent and require an approximately linear relationship between the measured property and image intensity. (This is most often the case in EFTEM and spectrum imaging) Some specimens contain internal references (such as elements with a known stoichiometric relationship) that are sufficient to get to a true concentration calibration for an image. However, in EELS imaging this still doesn’t allow us to get an understanding of our errors and rarely is it helpful in determining detection or quantification limits.
A competent high-school chemistry or physics student could tell us that a quantitative measurement includes both a measured value and an estimate of its error.
- Type
- EELS Microanalysis At High Sensitivity: Advances in Spectrum Imaging, Energy Filtering and Detection (Organized by R. Leapman and J. Bruley)
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2001
References
1. Currie, L.A., Anal. Chem. 40 (1968) 586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Hunt, J.A., and Williams, D.B. (1991), Ultramicr. 38, 47–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Swyt, C.R., X-Ray Spectrometry in Electron Beam Instruments, ed. Williams, D.B., Goldstein, J.I., Newbury, D.E., Plenum Press (1995) 159–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar