Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T08:06:29.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Tilting Procedure to Enhance Compositional Contrast and Reduce Residual Bragg Contrast in EFTEM Imaging of Planar Interfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

K.T. Moore
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD21218U.S.A.
E.A. Stach
Affiliation:
National Center for Electron Microscopy, Lawrence Berkeley National Labs, Berkeley, CA94720U.S.A.
J.M. Howe
Affiliation:
Department of Material Science and Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA22903U.S.A.
D.C. Elbert
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD21218U.S.A.
D.R. Veblen
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD21218U.S.A.
Get access

Extract

When acquiring energy-filtered TEM (EFTEM) images of a crystalline material, the detrimental effects of diffraction contrast can often be seen in raw energy-filtered images (EFI) (i.e., pre-edge and post-edge images), jump-ratio images and elemental maps as residual diffraction contrast. Residual diffraction contrast occurs in raw EFI because of plural scattering (i.e., inelastic-elastic and elastic-inelastic electron scattering) and in jump-ratio images and elemental maps because background removal procedures often are unable to completely account for intensity changes due to dynamical effects (elastic scattering) that occur between pre-edge and post-edge images acquired at different energy losses.

It is demonstrated in these experiments that, when examining a planar interface, EFTEM images have increased compositional contrast and decreased residual diffraction contrast when the sample is oriented so that the interface is parallel to the electron beam, but not directly on a zone axis.

Type
Electron Energy-Loss Spectroscopy (EELS) and Imaging
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Bakenfelder, A., Fromm, I., Reimer, L., Rennekamp, R., J. of Microscopy 159(2) (1990) 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Moore, K.T., Howe, J.M., Elbert, D.C., Ultramicroscopy, 80(3) (1999) 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Schenner, M., Nelhiebel, M., Schattschneider, P., Ultramicroscopy 65 (1996) 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Hofer, F., Warbichler, P., Grogger, W, Ultramicroscopy 59 (1995) 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Moore, K.T., Howe, J.M., Veblen, D.R., Murray, T.M., Stach, E.A., Ultramicroscopy, 80(3) (1999) 221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. This work was supported by NSF grant EAR-9418090 to David R. Veblen and by NSF grant DMR-9630092 to James M. Howe.Google Scholar