Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T00:23:07.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Testing the Reliability of Anatomical and Epidermical Characters in Grass Taxonomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

M. Cristina*
Affiliation:
Department of Botany & IAV, University of Coimbra, 3001-456 Coimbra, Portugal
A. Dinis
Affiliation:
Department of Botany & IAV, University of Coimbra, 3001-456 Coimbra, Portugal
F. Sales
Affiliation:
Department of Botany & IAV, University of Coimbra, 3001-456 Coimbra, Portugal
*
Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Grasses are simplified plants and the leaf is one of the few organs that provides taxonomic characters. Leaf anatomy and epidermis (and associated structures) have been used as characters in taxonomy of Poaceae since the 1930s. Such characters became well-established and accepted in the 1960s with Metcalfe's investigations. However, recent research casts doubts on the consistency and reliability of such characters [e.g. 3]. Grasses are highly adaptable plants due to their marked phenotypic plasticity. In order to assess the reliability of leaf characters, species that occur in very contrasting habitats constitute the ideal case study. Corynephorus canescens (L.) P. Beauv. and Antinoria agrostidea (DC.) Parl. were selected; the former occurs from coastal sandy dunes to high altitude, the latter survives submerged and in ponds that dry-out during summer.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2008