Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:06:07.484Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structural and Ultrastructural Characteristics of the Spix's Yellow-Toothed Cavy (Galea spixii, Wagler, 1831) Tongue

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2022

André Neri Tomiate
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Morphology, Institute of Biosciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil
Gabriela Klein Barbosa
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Morphology, Institute of Biosciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil
Gabriela de Souza Reginato
Affiliation:
Department of Physiological Sciences, Center of Biological Sciences, State University of Londrina, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil
Paula Oliveira Camargo
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Morphology, Institute of Biosciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil
Moacir Franco de Oliveira
Affiliation:
Federal Rural University of the Semi-Arid Region (UFERSA), Mossoró, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil
Ii-sei Watanabe
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Morphology, Institute of Biosciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil Department of Anatomy, Institute of Biomedical Sciences III (ICB III), University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil
Adriano Polican Ciena*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Morphology, Institute of Biosciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil
*
*Corresponding author: Adriano Polican Ciena, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The tongue is a fundamental organ in feeding, vocalization, and grooming. It is characterized by evolutionary adaptations reflected by diet, habitat, and function. Rodents are a very diverse mammalian order and the tongue's morphology varies in size, form, and presence of papillae. This work aimed to describe the morphological and ultrastructural aspects of the tongue of Spix's yellow-toothed cavy (Galea spixii, Wagler, 1831). Tongues of Spix's yellow-toothed cavies were analyzed with light microscopy, scanning, and transmission electron microscopy. The results showed that the tongue was divided into apex, body, and root. There were different types of papillae, such as vallate, foliate, laterally placed fungiform, fungiform, filiform, and robust filiform. The epithelium was organized into layers, including keratinized, granulous, spinous, and basal, below were lamina propria, and musculature, which evolved mucous and serous gland clusters. The tongue of Spix's yellow-toothed cavy was structurally and ultrastructurally similar to other rodents and had papillae with similar morphologies to other Caviidae species. However, the presence of robust filiform papillary lines and laterally placed fungiform papillae showed the main differences from other species. This was the first description of the tongue of Spix's yellow-toothed cavy.

Type
Micrographia
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barbosa, GK, Jacob, CS, Pimentel Neto, J, de Oliveira, MF, Rici, REG, Watanabe, I & Ciena, AP (2020). Structural and ultrastructural characteristics of the tongue of the collared peccary (Pecari tajacu, Linnaeus, 1758). Anat Histol Embryol 49, 532540. doi:10.1111/ahe.12557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barboza, RD, Lopes, SF, Souto, WMS, Fernandes-Ferreira, H & Alves, RRN (2016). The role of game mammals as bushmeat in the Caatinga, Northeast Brazil. Ecol Soc 21(2). doi:10.5751/ES-08358-210202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beuchle, R, Grecchi, RC, Shimabukuro, YE, Seliger, R, Eva, HD, Sano, E & Achard, F (2015). Land cover changes in the Brazilian Cerrado and Caatinga biomes from 1990 to 2010 based on a systematic remote sensing sampling approach. Appl Geogr 58, 116127. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.01.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catzeflis, F, Patton, J, Percequillo, A & Weksler, M (2016). Galea spixii. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T8825A22189453. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-2.RLTS.T8825A22189453.en.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciena, AP, Bolina, CS, De Almeida, SRY, Rici, REG, De Oliveira, MF, da Silva, MCP, Miglino, MA & Watanabe, I (2013). Structural and ultrastructural features of the agouti tongue (Dasyprocta aguti Linnaeus, 1766). J Anat 233, 152158. doi:10.1111/joa.12065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciena, AP, Santos, AC, Vasconcelos, BG, Rici, REG, De Assis Neto, AC, De Almeida, SRY, Miglino, MA & Watanabe, I (2019). Morphological characteristics of the papillae and lingual epithelium of guinea pig (Cavia porcellus). Acta Zool 100(1), 5360. doi:10.1111/azo.12230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cizek, P, Hamouzova, P, Jekl, V & Tichy, F (2017). Light and scanning electron microscopy of the tongue of a degu (Octodon degus). Anat Sci Int 92, 493499. doi:10.1007/s12565-016-0346-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Aro, MM, Dos Santos, AC, Da Silveira, EE, Lisboa Neto, AFS, De Oliveira, MF & De Assis Neto, AC (2019). Morphological tools to evaluate the digestory apparatus in rocky cavy (Kerodon rupestris). Microsc Res Tech 82(6), 696708. doi:10.1002/jemt.23216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunnum, JL & Salazar-Bravo, J (2010). Phylogeny, evolution, and systematics of the Galea musteloides complex (Rodentia: Caviidae). J Mammal 91(1), 243259. doi:10.1644/08-MAMM-A-214R1.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emura, S (2008). SEM study on the lingual papillae and their connective tissue cores of the capybara. Med Biol 152, 386393.Google Scholar
Emura, S & El Bakary, NER (2014). Morphology of the lingual papillae of Egyptian buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn 91(1), 1317. doi:10.2535/ofaj.91.13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emura, S, Okumura, T & Chen, H (2011 a). Morphology of the lingual papillae in the Patagonian cavy. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn 88(3), 121125. doi:10.2535/ofaj.88.121CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emura, S, Okumura, T & Chen, H (2011 b). Morphology of the lingual papillae in the roan antelope. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn 88(3), 127131. doi:10.2535/ofaj.88.127CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Igbokwe, CO & Mbajiorgu, FE (2019). Anatomical and scanning electron microscopic study of the tongue in the African giant pouched rats (Cricetomys gambianus, waterhouse). Anat Histol Embryol 48, 455465. doi:10.1111/ahe.12467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwasaki, S (2002). Evolution of the structure and function of the vertebrate tongue. J Anat 201, 113. doi:10.1046/j.1469-7580.2002.00073.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackowiak, H & Godynicki, S (2005). The distribution and structure of the lingual papillae on the tongue of the bank vole Clethrionomys glareolus. Folia Morphol 64(4), 326333.Google Scholar
Kilinc, M, Erdogan, S, Ketani, S & Ketani, MA (2010). Morphological study by scanning electron microscopy of the lingual papillae in the Middle East blind mole rat (Spalax ehrenbergi, Nehring, 1898). Anat Histol Embryol 39(6), 509515. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0264.2010.01022.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitajima, K & Kobayashi, K (1992). Light and electron microscopic studies on the lingual papillae and their connective tissue cores in hamster. Jpn J Oral Biol 34, 503530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, K (1990). Three-dimensional architecture of the connective tissue core of the lingual papillae in the Guinea pig. Anat Embryol 182(3), 205213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kobayashi, K, Miyata, K, Takahashi, K & Iwasaki, S (1989). Three-dimensional architecture of the connective tissue papillae of the mouse tongue as viewed by scanning electron microscopy. Kaibogaku Zasshi 64, 523538.Google ScholarPubMed
Larcher, TE (1981). The comparative social behavior of Kerodon rupestris and Galea spixii and the evolution of behavior in the Caviidae. Bull Carnegie Mus Nat 17(1), 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendes, BV (1987). Plantas e animais para o Nordeste. Rio de Janeiro, BR: Editora Globo.Google Scholar
Reginato, GS, Barbosa, GK, Ferreira, AO, Vasconcelos, BG, Rici, REG, Watanabe, I & Ciena, AP (2020). Morphological and ultrastructural characteristics of the tongue of wild boar. Eur J Histochem 64(2), 156163. doi:10.4081/ejh.2020.3128CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reginato, GS, Bolina, CS, Watanabe, I & Ciena, AP (2014). Three-dimensional aspects of the lingual papillae and their connective tissue cores in the tongue of rats: A scanning electron microscope study. Sci World J. doi:10.1155/2014/841879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadeghinezhad, J, Tootian, Z & Javadi, F (2018). Anatomical and histological structure of the tongue and histochemical characteristics of the lingual salivary glands in the Persian squirrel (Sciurus anomalus). Anat Sci Int 93, 5868. doi:10.1007/s12565-016-0367-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shindo, J, Yoshimura, K & Kobayashi, K (2006). Comparative morphological study on the stereo-structure of the lingual papillae and their connective tissue cores of the American beaver (Castor canadensis). Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn 82, 127137. doi:10.2535/ofaj.82.127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomiate, AN, Barbosa, GK, Rici, R, De Almeida, SRY, Watanabe, IS & Ciena, AP (2022). Structural and ultrastructural changes in the tongue of mdx mice. Microsc Microanal 28(2), 559566. doi:10.1017/S1431927622000022Google Scholar
Tomiate, AN, Barbosa, GK, Rocha, LC, De Almeida, SRY, De Oliveira, MF, Watanabe, I & Ciena, AP (2021 b). Structural and ultrastructural characteristics of the red-rumped agouti (Dasyprocta leporina - Linnaeus, 1758) palatine epithelium. Microsc Microanal 27(3), 645649. doi:10.1017/S1431927621000350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomiate, AN, Barbosa, GK, Rocha, LC, Vasconcelos, BG, De Almeida, SRY, Miglino, MA, Watanabe, I & Ciena, AP (2021 a). Structural and ultrastructural characterization of the palatine epithelium of the Guinea pig: A new record of telocytes in the oral cavity. Microsc Res Tech 84(8), 16211627. doi:10.1002/jemt.23722CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, R & Hasnain, S (2017). Analyzing the properties of murine intestinal mucins by electrophoresis and histology. Bio-Protocol 7(14). doi:10.21769/bioprotoc.2394CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wannaprasert, T (2018). Morphological characteristics of the tongue and lingual papillae of the large bamboo rat (Rhizomys sumatrensis). Anat Sci Int 93, 323331. doi:10.1007/s12565-017-0414-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, I, dos Santos Haemmerle, CA, Dias, FJ, Cury, DP, Da Silva, MCP, Sosthines, MCK, Dos Santos, TC, Guimarães, JP & Miglino, MA (2013). Structural characterization of the capybara (Hydrochaeris hydrochaeris) tongue by light, scanning, and transmission electron microscopy. Microsc Res Tech 76(2), 141155. doi:10.1002/jemt.22145CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zheng, J & Kobayashi, K (2006). Comparative morphological study on the lingual papillae and their connective tissue cores (CTC) in reeves’ muntjac deer (Muntiacus reevesi). Ann Anat 188(6), 555564. doi:10.1016/j.aanat.2006.05.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar