Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:02:51.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quantitative Electrochemical Measurements Using In Situ ec-S/TEM Devices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2014

Raymond R. Unocic ,
Robert L. Sacci ,
Gilbert M. Brown ,
Gabriel M. Veith ,
Nancy J. Dudney ,
Karren L. More ,
Franklin S. Walden II ,
Daniel S. Gardiner ,
John Damiano  and
David P. Nackashi
Raymond R. Unocic*
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA
Robert L. Sacci
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Materials Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA
Gilbert M. Brown
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Chemical Sciences Division, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA
Gabriel M. Veith
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Materials Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA
Nancy J. Dudney
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Materials Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA
Karren L. More
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA
Franklin S. Walden II
Affiliation:
Protochips Inc., Raleigh, NC 27606, USA
Daniel S. Gardiner
Affiliation:
Protochips Inc., Raleigh, NC 27606, USA
John Damiano
Affiliation:
Protochips Inc., Raleigh, NC 27606, USA
David P. Nackashi
Affiliation:
Protochips Inc., Raleigh, NC 27606, USA
*
*Corresponding Author. [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Insight into dynamic electrochemical processes can be obtained with in situ electrochemical-scanning/transmission electron microscopy (ec-S/TEM), a technique that utilizes microfluidic electrochemical cells to characterize electrochemical processes with S/TEM imaging, diffraction, or spectroscopy. The microfluidic electrochemical cell is composed of microfabricated devices with glassy carbon and platinum microband electrodes in a three-electrode cell configuration. To establish the validity of this method for quantitative in situ electrochemistry research, cyclic voltammetry (CV), choronoamperometry (CA), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) were performed using a standard one electron transfer redox couple [Fe(CN)6]3−/4−-based electrolyte. Established relationships of the electrode geometry and microfluidic conditions were fitted with CV and chronoamperometic measurements of analyte diffusion coefficients and were found to agree with well-accepted values that are on the order of 10−5 cm2/s. Influence of the electron beam on electrochemical measurements was found to be negligible during CV scans where the current profile varied only within a few nA with the electron beam on and off, which is well within the hysteresis between multiple CV scans. The combination of experimental results provides a validation that quantitative electrochemistry experiments can be performed with these small-scale microfluidic electrochemical cells provided that accurate geometrical electrode configurations, diffusion boundary layers, and microfluidic conditions are accounted for.

Keywords

in situ ec-S/TEMelectrochemistrymicrofluidic electrochemical cellsmicroelectrodes
Type
In Situ Special Section
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , April 2014 , pp. 452 - 461
Copyright
© Microscopy Society of America 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amatore, C. (1995). Electrochemistry at ultramicroelectrodes. In Physical Electrochemistry: Principles, Methods, and Applications, Rubinstein, I. (Ed.), pp. 131–208. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.Google Scholar
Bard, A.J. & Faulkner, L.R. (2001). Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and Applications, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
Beriet, C. & Pletcher, D. (1993). A microelectrode study of the mechanism and kinetics of the ferro/ferricyanide couple in aqueous media: The influence of the electrolyte and its concentration. J Electroanal Chem 361, 93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, A.M. & Lay, P.A. (1986). Cyclic voltammetry at microelectrodes in the absence of added electrolyte using a platinum quasi-reference electrode. J Electroanal Chem, 199, 285–295.Google Scholar
Chen, X., Noh, K.W., Wen, J.G. & Dillon, S.J. (2012). In situ electrochemical wet cell transmission electron microscopy characterization of solid–liquid interactions between Ni and aqueous NiCl. Acta Materialia, 60, 192–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Compton, R.G., Fisher, A.C., Geoffrey, W.R., Dobson, P.J. & Leigh, P.A. (1993). Hydrodynamic voltammetry with microelectrodes channel microband electrodes theory and experiment. J Phys Chem Lett, 97, 10410–10415.Google Scholar
de Jonge, N. & Ross, F.M. (2011). Electron microscopy of specimens in liquid. Nat Nanotechnol, 6, 695–704.Google Scholar
Evans, J.E., Jungjohann, K.L., Browning, N.D. & Arslan, I. (2011). Controlled growth of nanoparticles from solution with in situ liquid transmission electron microscopy. Nano Lett, 11, 2809–2813.Google Scholar
Franceschetti, D.R. Macdonald, J.R. & Buck, R.P. (1991). Interpretation of finite-length-warburg-type impedances in supported and unsupported electrochemical-cells with kinetically reversible electrodes. J Electrochem Soc, 138, 1368–1371.Google Scholar
Gabrielli, C., Keddam, M., Portail, N., Rousseau, P., Takenouti, H. & Vivier, V. (2006). Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy investigations of a microelectrode behavior in a thin-layer cell: Experimental and theoretical studies. J Phys Chem B, 110, 20478–20485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gu, M., Parent, L.R., Mehdi, L., Unocic, R.R., McDowell, M.T., Sacci, R.L., Xu, W., Abellan, P., Chen, X., Zhang, Y., Perea, D.E., Lauhon, L.J., Arslan, I., Zhang, J.G., Cui, Y., Browning, N.D. & Wang, C.M. (2013). Demonstration of an electrochemical liquid cell for operando transmission electron microscopy observation of the lithiation/delithiation behavior of Si nanowire battery anodes. Nano Lett, 13, 6106–6112.Google Scholar
Harrington, D.A. & van den Driessche, P. (2011). Mechanisms and equivalent circuits in electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Electrochim Acta, 56, 8005–8013.Google Scholar
Holtz, M.E., Yu, Y., Gao, J., Abruna, H.D. & Muller, D.E. (2013). In situ electron energy-loss spectroscopy in liquids. Microsc Microanal, 19, 1027–1035.Google Scholar
Huang, W. & McCreery, R. (1992). Electron transfer kinetics of Fe(CN)6 3−/4− on laser-activated and CN-modified Pt electrodes. J Electroanal Chem, 326, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, A.T. & Anson, F.C. (1970). The theory and practice of electrochemistry with thin layer cells. In Electroanalytical Chemistry, vol. 4, Bard, A.J. (Ed.), pp. 129–214. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.Google Scholar
Jungjohann, K.L., Bliznakov, S., Sutter, P.W., Stach, E.A. & Sutter, E.A. (2013). In situ liquid cell electron microscopy of the solution growth of Au–Pd core-shell nanostructures. Nano Lett, 13, 2964–2970.Google Scholar
Kovach, P.M., Caudill, W.L., Peters, D.G. & Wightman, R.M. (1985). Faradaic electrochemistry at microcylinder, band, and tubular band electrode. J Electroanal Chem, 185, 285–295.Google Scholar
Liao, H.G., Cui, L., Whitelam, S. & Zheng, H. (2012). Real-time imaging of Pt3Fe nanorod growth in solution. Science, 336, 1011–1014.Google Scholar
Nicholson, R.S. & Shain, I. (1964). Theory of stationary electrode polarography. Anal Chem, 36, 706–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noh, K.W., Liu, Y., Sun, L. & Dillon, S.J. (2012). Challenges associated with in-situ TEM in environmental systems: The case of silver in aqueous solutions. Ultramicroscopy, 116, 34–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parent, L.R., Robinson, D.B., Woehl, T.J., Ristenpart, W.D., Evans, J.E., Browning, N.D. & Arslan, I. (2012). Direct in situ observation of nanoparticle synthesis in a liquid crystal surfactant template. ACS Nano, 6, 3589–3596.Google Scholar
Ring, E.A. & de Jonge, N. (2010). Microfluidic system for transmission electron microscopy. Microsc Microanal, 16, 622–629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rooney, M.B., Coomber, D.C. & Bond, A.M. (2000). Achievement of near-reversible behavior for the [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− redox couple using cyclic voltammetry at glassy carbon, gold, and platinum macrodisk electrodes in the absence of added supporting electrolyte. Anal Chem, 72, 3486–3491.Google Scholar
Seddon, B.J., Eddowes, M.J., Firth, A., Owen, A.E. & Girault, H.H.J. (2009). Thin film electrode: A new method for the fabrication of submicrometer band electrodes. Electrochim Acta, 36, 763–771.Google Scholar
White, E.R., Singer, S.B., Augustyn, V., Hubbard, W.A., Mecklenburg, M., Dunn, B. & Regan, B.C. (2012). In situ transmission electron microscopy of lead dendrites and lead ions in aqueous solution. ACS Nano, 6, 6308–6317.Google Scholar
Williamson, M.J., Tromp, R.M., Vereecken, P.M., Hull, R. & Ross, F.M. (2003). Dynamic microscopy of nanoscale cluster growth at the solid–liquid interface. Nat Mater, 2, 532–536.Google Scholar
Woehl, T.J., Evans, J.E., Arslan, I., Ristenpart, W.D. & Browning, N.D. (2012). Direct in situ determination of the mechanisms controlling nanoparticle nucleation and growth. ACS Nano, 6, 8599–8610.Google Scholar
Woehl, T.J., Jungjohann, K.L., Evans, J.E., Arslan, I., Ristenpart, W.D. & Browning, N.D. (2013). Experimental procedures to mitigate electron beam induced artifacts during in situ fluid imaging of nanomaterials. Ultramicroscopy, 127, 53–63.Google Scholar
Zheng, H., Smith, R.K., Jun, Y.W., Kisielowski, C., Dahmen, U. & Alivisatos, A.P. (2009). Observation of single colloidal platinum nanocrystal growth trajectories. Science, 324, 1309–1312.Google Scholar