Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T19:49:05.874Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prospects for X-Ray Analysis of Rough Surfaces in the SEM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

P.J. Statham*
Affiliation:
Oxford Instruments Analytical Ltd, Halifax Road, High Wycombe, Bucks, HP 12 3 SE , UK
Get access

Extract

Some of the key aspects affecting analysis of a rough surface are described in Fig. 1. If a hypothetical sample consisting of 96% Si, 1% O, 1% Na, 1% Al and 1% Fe is analysed at 20kV at constant beam current with an x-ray detector elevated at 30deg from horizontal then the measured intensities of the various characteristic lines will vary with tilt. While absorption of low energy x-rays is reduced as the sample tilts towards the detector, there is also a gradual loss of intensity due to increased backscatter. At the lower beam voltage of 5kV, absorption of x-rays at zero tilt is already small and Fig.2 shows that variation in intensity with positive tilts is substantially reduced, although absorption still becomes significant if the sample is tilted away from the detector.

Type
X-Ray Microanalysis Of Rough Surfaces
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References:

1.Small, J in “Handbook of X-ray Spectrometry” (Eds. Van Grieken & Marcowixz) (1992) 621Google Scholar
2.Fecher, K, Scanning 7 (1985) 297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Wiens, R C et al, Microbeam Analysis, 3 (1994) 117Google Scholar
4.Armstrong, J T and Busek, P R, Anal.Chem 47 (1975) 2178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Gauvin, R and Lifshin, E, Microscopy and Microanalysis, 5 [Supp.2] (1999) 578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Statham, P J, Mikrochimica Acta [Wien] Suppl.8 (1979) 229Google Scholar
7.Statham, P J. Mikrochim.Acta[Suppl.] 13 (1996) 573Google Scholar