Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:51:09.682Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Phase Retrieval Quantitative Comparison Between Tilt-series Imaging in TEM and Position-resolved Coherent Diffractive Imaging in STEM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2017

Emanuela Liberti
Affiliation:
Electron Physical Science Imaging Centre (ePSIC), Diamond Light Source, Harwell Campus & Innovation Centre, Didcot, Oxfordshire, UK. University of Oxford, Department of Materials, Oxford, UK.
Gerardo Martinez
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, Department of Materials, Oxford, UK.
Colum O’Leary
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, Department of Materials, Oxford, UK.
Peter Nellist
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, Department of Materials, Oxford, UK.
Angus Kirkland
Affiliation:
Electron Physical Science Imaging Centre (ePSIC), Diamond Light Source, Harwell Campus & Innovation Centre, Didcot, Oxfordshire, UK. University of Oxford, Department of Materials, Oxford, UK.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Abstract
Copyright
© Microscopy Society of America 2017 

References

[1] Yang, H., et al, Nat. Comm 7 2016). p. 12532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Kirkland, A. I., et al, Ultramicroscopy 57 1995). p. 355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Haigh, S. J., et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 2009). p. 16.Google Scholar
[4] Coene, W. M. J., et al, Ultramicroscopy 64 1996). p. 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Rodenburg, J. M., et al, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 339 1992). p. 521.Google Scholar
[6] Liberti, E., et al, Microscopy and Microanalysis 22 2016). p. 922.Google Scholar