No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 July 2020
Several modalities of microscopic analysis have been employed in the investigation of development in the embryos of the sea urchins Strongylocentrotus purpuratusand Lytechinusvariegatus. These include scanning electron microscopy, confocal optical microscopy and multiphoton laser scanning microscopy. These techniques all provide information on embryonic morphogenesis in three-dimensions and may be of use in the analysis of other developing organisms.
Scanning Electron Microscopy. Scanning electron microscopy bridges the gap between light and transmission electron microscopy. Operation in the secondary electron image mode with stereo-pair images combines great depth of field in focus from 10-50,000x with true 3D images of topographical features from whole embryos to macromolecules. The SEM's backscatter electron imaging mode allows one to see and map spatial geographies of colloidal gold labeled probes (e.g. antibodies, lectins) that bind to exposed surfaces of embryos, cells and extracellular matrices.
1 . Morrill, J. B., Methods in Cell Biology, San Diego Academic Press 27 (1986) 263.Google Scholar
2 . Cherr, et al., Microsc. Res. Tech. 22 (1992) 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 . Summers, R.G. and Cheng, P.C., Proc. 47th Ann Meeting EMSA (1989) 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 . Cheng, P.C. and Summers, R.G., The Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy, San Francisco Press (1989) 163.Google Scholar
5 . Summers, R.G. et al., J. Electron Micr. Tech. 18 (1991) 24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 . Summers, R.G. et al., Dev. Growth Diff 35 (1991) 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 . Summers, R.G. et al., Methods in Cell Biology, San Diego Academic Press 38 (1993) 265.Google Scholar
8 . Marko, M. et al., J. Electron Microsc. Technol. 9 (1988) 395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 . Martins, G. G et al, Develop. Biol. 198 (1998) 330.Google Scholar
10. Summers, R G. et al., Develop. Biol. 175 (1996) 777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Piston, D. W. et al., Microsc. Microanal. 4 (1998) 404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar