Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:45:10.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Morphological and Performance Measures of Polyurethane Foams Using X-Ray CT and Mechanical Testing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2014

Brian M. Patterson ,
Kevin Henderson ,
Robert D. Gilbertson ,
Stephanie Tornga ,
Nikolaus L. Cordes ,
Manuel E. Chavez  and
Zachary Smith
Brian M. Patterson*
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Polymers and Coating Group, Materials Science and Technology Division, P.O. Box 1663, MS E549, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA
Kevin Henderson
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Polymers and Coating Group, Materials Science and Technology Division, P.O. Box 1663, MS E549, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA
Robert D. Gilbertson
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Polymers and Coating Group, Materials Science and Technology Division, P.O. Box 1663, MS E549, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA
Stephanie Tornga
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Polymers and Coating Group, Materials Science and Technology Division, P.O. Box 1663, MS E549, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA
Nikolaus L. Cordes
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Polymers and Coating Group, Materials Science and Technology Division, P.O. Box 1663, MS E549, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA
Manuel E. Chavez
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Polymers and Coating Group, Materials Science and Technology Division, P.O. Box 1663, MS E549, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA
Zachary Smith
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Polymers and Coating Group, Materials Science and Technology Division, P.O. Box 1663, MS E549, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA
*
*Corresponding author. [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Meso-scale structure in polymeric foams determines the mechanical properties of the material. Density variations, even more than variations in the anisotropic void structure, can greatly vary the compressive and tensile response of the material. With their diverse use as both a structural material and space filler, polyurethane (PU) foams are widely studied. In this manuscript, quantitative measures of the density and anisotropic structure are provided by using micro X-ray computed tomography (microCT) to better understand the results of mechanical testing. MicroCT illustrates the variation in the density, cell morphology, size, shape, and orientation in different regions in blown foam due to the velocity profile near the casting surface. “Interrupted” in situ imaging of the material during compression of these sub-regions indicates the pathways of the structural response to the mechanical load and the changes in cell morphology as a result. It is found that molded PU foam has a 6 mm thick “skin” of higher density and highly eccentric morphological structure that leads to wide variations in mechanical performance depending upon sampling location. This comparison is necessary to understand the mechanical performance of the anisotropic structure.

Keywords

cellular foamsmaterial processingmechanical propertiesPU foamX-Ray micro computed tomography
Type
Materials Applications
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , August 2014 , pp. 1284 - 1293
Copyright
© Microscopy Society of America 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adrien, J., Maire, E., Gimenez, N. & Sauvant-Moynot, V. (2007). Experimental study of the compression behaviour of syntactic foams by in situ X-ray tomography. Acta Materialia 55(5), 1667–1679.Google Scholar
Anderson, R.A., Lagasse, R.R., Russick, E.M. & Schroeder, J.L. (2002). Effects of void size and gas content on electrical breakdown in lightweight, mechanically compliant, void-filled dielectrics. J Appl Phys 91(5), 3205–3212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babout, L., Ludwig, W., Maire, E. & Buffiere, J.Y. (2003). Damage assessment in metallic structural meterials using high resolution synchrotron X-ray tomography. Nucl Instrum Meth Phys Res B 200, 303–307.Google Scholar
Bezazi, A. & Scarpa, F. (2007). Mechanical behaviour of conventional and negative Poisson’s ratio thermoplastic polyurethane foams under compressive cyclic loading. Int J Fatigue 29(5), 922–930.Google Scholar
Bikard, J., Bruchon, J., Coupez, T. & Silva, L. (2007). Numerical simulation of 3D polyurethane expansion during manufacturing process. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 309, 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burteau, A., N’Guyen, F., Bartout, J.D., Forest, S., Bienvenu, Y., Saberi, S. & Naumann, D. (2012). Impact of material processing and deformation on cell morphology and mechanical behavior of polyurethane and nickel foams. Int J Solids Struct 49(19–20), 2714–2732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvert, K., Trumble, K., Webster, T. & Kirkpatrick, L. (2010). Characterization of commercial rigid polyurethane foams used as bone analogs for implant testing. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 21(5), 1453–1461.Google Scholar
Chan, N. & Evans, K.E. (1997). Fabrication methods for auxetic foams. J Mater Sci 32(22), 5945–5953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chattopadhyay, D.K. & Raju, K.V.S.N. (2007). Structural engineering of polyurethane coatings for high performance applications. Prog Polym Sci 32(3), 352–418.Google Scholar
Dounis, D.V. & Wilkes, G.L. (1997). Structure-property relationships of flexible polyurethane foams. Polymer 38(11), 2819–2828.Google Scholar
Elliott, J.A., Windle, A.H., Hobdell, J.R., Eeckhaut, G., Oldman, R.J., Ludwig, W., Boller, E., Cloetens, P. & Baruchel, J. (2002). In-situ deformation of an open-cell flexible polyurethane foam characterised by 3D computed microtomography. J Mater Sci 37(8), 1547–1555.Google Scholar
Elwell, M.J., Ryan, A.J., Grünbauer, H.J.M. & Van Lieshout, H.C. (1996). In-situ studies of structure development during the reactive processing of model flexible polyurethane foam systems using FT-IR spectroscopy, synchrotron SAXS, and rheology. Macromolecules 29(8), 2960–2968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrigno, T.H. (1963). Rigid Plastic Foams. New York: Chapman & Hall Ltd. Google Scholar
Gibson, L.J. & Ashby, M.F. (1997). Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lifshitz, J.M. (1983). Some mechanical properties of rigid polyurethane structural foam. Polym Eng Sci 23(3), 144–154.Google Scholar
Morrell, P.R., Patel, M. & Pitts, S. (2012). X-ray CT microtomography and mechanical response of foamed polysiloxane elastomers. Polym Test 31, 102–109.Google Scholar
Patterson, B.M., Escobedo-Diaz, J.P., Dennis-Koller, D. & Cerreta, E.K. (2012). Dimensional quantification of embedded voids or objects in three dimensions using X-ray tomography. Microsc Microanal 18(2), 390–398.Google Scholar
Patterson, B.M., Henderson, K. & Smith, Z. (2013). Measure of morphological and performance properties in polymeric silicone foams by X-ray tomography. J Mater Sci 48(5), 1986–1996.Google Scholar
Saint-Michel, F., Chazeau, L., Cavaillé, J.-Y. & Chabert, E. (2006). Mechanical properties of high density polyurethane foams: I. Effect of the density. Compos Sci Technol 66(15), 2700–2708.Google Scholar
Somani, K.P., Kansara, S.S., Patel, N.K. & Rakshit, A.K. (2003). Castor oil based polyurethane adhesives for wood-to-wood bonding. Int J Adhes Adhesives 23(4), 269–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, B., Lu, W.-Y., Syn, C. & Chen, W. (2009). The effects of strain rate, density, and temperature on the mechanical properties of polymethylene diisocyanate (PMDI)-based rigid polyurethane foams during compression. J Mater Sci 44(2), 351–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J., Yazzie, K., Connor Phillips, N., Chawla, N., Xiao, X., Carlo, F., Iyyer, N. & Kittur, M. (2011). On the Correlation Between Fatigue Striation Spacing and Crack Growth Rate: A Three-Dimensional (3-D) X-ray Synchrotron Tomography Study. Metallurg Mater Trans A 42(13), 3845–3848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J.C. Jr., Matlaga, B.R., Kim, S.C., Jackson, M.E., Sommer, A.J., McAteer, J.A., Lingeman, J.E. & Evan, A.P. (2006). Calcium oxalate calculi found attached to the renal papilla: Preliminary evidence for early mechanisms in stone formation. J Endourol 20(11), 885–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamashita, T., Suzuki, K., Nishino, S. & Tomota, Y. (2008). Relationship between sound absorption property and microscopic structure determined by X-ray computed tomography in urethane foam used as sound absorption material for automobiles. Mater Trans 49(2), 345–351.Google Scholar
Zhang, H., Qu, P.C., Sakaguchi, Y., Toda, H., Kobayashi, M., Uesugi, K. & Suzuki, Y. (2010). Three-dimensional characterization of fatique crack propagation behavior in an aluminum alloy using high resolution X-ray microtomography. Mater Sci Forum 638–642, 378–383.Google Scholar
Zide, B. & Pardoe, R. (1976). The many uses of polyurethane foam. Am J Surg 132(3), 424–426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed