Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T10:25:34.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mitigating Curtaining Artifacts During Ga FIB TEM Lamella Preparation of a 14 nm FinFET Device

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2017

Andrey Denisyuk ,
Tomáš Hrnčíř ,
Jozef Vincenc Oboňa ,
Sharang ,
Martin Petrenec  and
Jan Michalička
Andrey Denisyuk*
Affiliation:
TESCAN ORSAY HOLDING, Libušina třída 21, 62300 Brno, Czech Republic
Tomáš Hrnčíř
Affiliation:
TESCAN Brno, Libušina třída 1, 62300 Brno, Czech Republic
Jozef Vincenc Oboňa
Affiliation:
TESCAN ORSAY HOLDING, Libušina třída 21, 62300 Brno, Czech Republic
Sharang
Affiliation:
TESCAN Brno, Libušina třída 1, 62300 Brno, Czech Republic
Martin Petrenec
Affiliation:
TESCAN Brno, Libušina třída 1, 62300 Brno, Czech Republic
Jan Michalička
Affiliation:
TESCAN ORSAY HOLDING, Libušina třída 21, 62300 Brno, Czech Republic
*
*Corresponding author. [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

We report on the mitigation of curtaining artifacts during transmission electron microscopy (TEM) lamella preparation by means of a modified ion beam milling approach, which involves altering the incident angle of the Ga ions by rocking of the sample on a special stage. We applied this technique to TEM sample preparation of a state-of-the-art integrated circuit based on a 14-nm technology node. Site-specific lamellae with a thickness <15 nm were prepared by top-down Ga focused ion beam polishing through upper metal contacts. The lamellae were analyzed by means of high-resolution TEM, which showed a clear transistor structure and confirmed minimal curtaining artifacts. The results are compared with a standard inverted thinning preparation technique.

Keywords

TEM samplelamellaintegrated circuitFinFET device
Type
Materials Science Applications
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , June 2017 , pp. 484 - 490
Copyright
© Microscopy Society of America 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvis, R., Blackwood, J., Lee, S.-H. & Bray, M. (2012). High-throughput, site-specific sample prep of ultra-thin TEM lamella for process metrology and failure analysis. In ISTFA 2012: Conference Proceedings from the 38th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, Phoenix, AZ, USA, November 11–15, 2012, pp. 391–398. Materials Park, OH: ASM International.Google Scholar
Buxbaum, A., Schampers, R. & Bolt, J. (2009). Backside TEM sample preparation with the multi-loader flip-stage. Microsc Microanal 15(S2), 334–335.Google Scholar
Clarke, J.J. (2015). A novel approach to TEM preparation with a (7-axis stage) triple-beam FIB-SEM system. Proc SPIE 9636, 963607.Google Scholar
Gazda, J., Duarte, J. & Daby-Merrill, F. (2010). Twice flipped – avoiding milling curtains in FIB prepared TEM specimens of nano-electronics devices. Microsc Microanal 16(S2), 230–231.Google Scholar
Giannuzzi, L.A. (2012a). Routine backside FIB milling with EXpressLO™. In ISTFA 2012: Conference Proceedings from the 38th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, Phoenix, AZ, USA, November 11–15, 2012, pp. 388–390. Materials Park, OH: ASM International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giannuzzi, L.A. (2012b). EXpressLO™ for fast and versatile FIB specimen preparation. Microsc Microanal 18(S2), 632–633.Google Scholar
Giannuzzi, L.A. & Stevie, F.A. (2005). Introduction to Focused Ion Beams: Instrumentation, Theory, Techniques and Practice. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giannuzzi, L.A., Van Leer, B. & Ringnalda, J. (2007). Evidence for a critical amorphisation thickness limit of Ga+ion bombardment in Si. Microsc Microanal 13(S2), 1516–1517.Google Scholar
Hrnčíř, T., Dluhoš, J., Hladík, L., Moyal, E., Teshima, J. & Kopeček, J. (2014). Advances in FIB-SEM analysis of TSV and Solder Bumps – Approaching higher precision, throughput and comprehensiveness. In ISTFA 2014: Conference Proceedings from the 40th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, Houston, TX, USA, November 9–13, 2014, pp. 136–142. Materials Park, OH: ASM International.Google Scholar
Hrnčíř, T., Yap, H.H., Moyal, E. & Teshima, J. (2016). Improvement of top-down delayering techniques on advanced technology nodes. In IPFA 2016 Conference Proceedings, Marina Bay Sands, Singapore, July 18--21, 2016, pp. 81–85. Singapore: IEEE.Google Scholar
Lechner, L., Biskupek, J. & Kaiser, U. (2012). Improved focused ion beam target preparation of (S)TEM specimen – A method for obtaining ultrathin lamellae. Microsc Microanal 18(2), 379–384.Google Scholar
Luo, J.-Sh. & Lee, H.T. (2014). To eliminate curtain effect of FIB TEM samples by a combination of sample dicing and backside milling. In ISTFA 2014: Conference Proceedings from the 40th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, Houston, TX, USA, November 9--13, 2014, pp. 400–405. Materials Park, OH: ASM International.Google Scholar
Malis, T., Cheng, S.C. & Egerton, R.F. (1988). EELS log-ratio technique for specimen-thickness measurement in the TEM. J Electron Microsc Tech 8(2), 193–200.Google Scholar
Oboňa, J.V., Hrnčíř, T., Sharang, Šikula, M. & Denisyuk, A. (2016). Xe plasma FIB delayering of IC based on 14 nm node technology. Microsc Microanal 22(S3), 56–57.Google Scholar
Schwarz, S.M., Kempshall, B.W., Giannuzzi, L.A. & McCartney, M.R. (2003). Avoiding the curtaining effect: Backside milling by FIB INLO. Microsc Microanal 9(S2), 116–117.Google Scholar
Sung, Ch.Sh., Lee, H.T. & Luo, J.Sh. (2015). TEM sample preparation tricks for advanced DRAMs. In ISTFA 2015: Conference Proceedings from the 41st International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, Portland, OR, USA, November 1--5, 2015, pp. 323–327. Materials Park, OH: ASM International.Google Scholar
Ugurlu, O., Strauss, M., Dutrow, G., Blackwood, J., Routh, B. Jr., Senowitz, C., Plachinda, P. & Alvis, R. (2013). High-volume process monitoring of FEOL 22nm FinFET structures using an automated STEM. Proc SPIE 8681, 868107.Google Scholar