Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T03:58:28.134Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Microprobe Study to Differentiate Bulk Chemical Data by Neutron Activation Analysis on Guatemalan Pottery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

L. Ross
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211
J. Cogswell
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211
H. Neff
Affiliation:
Research Reactor Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211
Get access

Extract

Bulk chemical characterizaton with techniques such as neutron activation analysis (NAA) has been used for many years to identify sources of archaeological artifacts by comparing bulk chemical profiles of archaeological artifacts to profiles determined for samples of raw material for source identification. The chemical approach to determining the provenance of archaeological pottery is complicated by the paste preparation activities of potters and by post-depositional processes. In a ceramic provenance investigation, the investigator typically identifies a series of relatively homogeneous subgroups, which most often are assumed to represent geographically restricted raw material sources. Although the source-specific interpretation is often the most parsimonious explanation of compositional patterning, it is really only the first of several competing hypotheses which, singly or in combination, might account for patterns of similarity and difference in a compositional data set. In this case, two white firing pottery types (SAWH and Ivory) made during the Late and Terminal Formative periods (300 B.C. - 200 A.D.) in southeastern Mesoamerica (Guatemala) were found to be chemically distinct.

Type
Quantitative Microanalysis
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Neff, H. and Glascock, M. D., Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, Articles 196, #2 (1995)275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Arnold, D. E. et al., American Anthropologist 93 (1991)70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Neff, H., in Ramenofsky, A. and Steffan, A., Ed., Measuring Time, Space, and Material: Unit Issues in Archeology, University of Utah Press,(in press).Google Scholar
4.Donovan, J. and Tingle, T., Journal of Microscopy 2.1 (1996)1.Google Scholar
5. This research was supported by the National Science Foundation under Contract SBR-9600334.Google Scholar