Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T12:24:29.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Magnetic Contrast in the cFEG SEM Using the Upper (Above-the-Lens) Detector

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

L.N. Brewer
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University 2225 North Campus Drive, Evanston, IL, 60208
V.P. Dravid
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University 2225 North Campus Drive, Evanston, IL, 60208
Get access

Extract

An unconventional and important use of the SEM is in the study of magnetic phenomena of materials. Many magnetic phenomena occur on the surfaces of materials as is the case for magnetic recording in computer memory and audio tapes. The “above-the-lens” or “upper” detector of the cFEG SEM(Hitachi S4500) is especially suited to probing surface phenomena (Fig. 1). The upper detector is used in combination with a magnetic “snorkel” lens which pulls secondary electrons (SE) up to the detector, resulting in an extremely high and pure SE yield. While magnetic imaging in a standard, side-mounted Everhart-Thornley (lower) detector is well understood, the image contrast mechanism for the upper detector is not presently known. We tested both energy filtering and trajectory contrast as possible magnetic contrast mechanisms using a cassette recording tape (Fe2O3 based) and barium hexaferrite ceramic magnets.

Two sets of experiments were performed to explore the magnetic contrast.

Type
Recent Developments in Microscopy for Studying Electronic and Magnetic Materials
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Sato, M.et al., Hitachi Review 43, 191194 (1994).Google Scholar

2 Joy, D.C. and Jakubovics, J.P., Brit. Journ. Appl. Phys. 2, 13671372 (1969).Google Scholar

3 Newbury, D.E.et al., in Advanced Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis (Plenum Press, New York, 1986), p. 448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Joy, D.C., Personal Communication, 1996.Google Scholar

5 Reimer, L., in Scanning Electron Microscopy: Physics of Image Formation and Microanalysis (Sringer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985), Vol. 45, p. 227271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar