Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T08:19:01.497Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is Localized Infrared Spectroscopy Now Possible in the Electron Microscope?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2014

Peter Rez
Peter Rez*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 82287-1504, USA
*
*Corresponding author. [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The recently developed in-column monochromators make it possible to record energy-c spectra with resolutions better than 30 meV from nanometer-sized regions. It should therefore in principle be possible to detect localized vibrational excitations. The scattering geometry in the electron microscope means that bond stretching in the specimen plane or longitudinal optic phonons dominate the scattering. Most promising for initial studies are vibrations with energies between 300 and 400 meV from hydrogen bonded to other atoms. Estimates of the scattering cross-sections on the basis of a simple model show that they are about the same as inner shell scattering cross-sections. Cross-sections also increase with charge transfer between the atoms, and theory incorporating realistic charge distributions shows that signal/noise is the only limitation to high-resolution imaging. Given the magnitude of the scattering cross-sections, minimizing the tail of the zero-loss peak is just as important as achieving a small-width at half-maximum. Improvements in both resolution and controlling the zero-loss tail will be necessary before it is practical to detect optic phonons in solids between 40 and 60 meV.

Keywords

energy lossinfraredRamanoptic phononcross-section
Type
EDGE Special Issue
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , June 2014 , pp. 671 - 677
Copyright
© Microscopy Society of America 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amali, A. & Rez, P. (1997). Theory of lattice resolution in high angle annular dark field images. Microsc Microanal 3, 28–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, L. (2004). Matrix infrared spectra and density functional calculations of transition metal hydrides and dihydrogen complexes. Chem Soc Rev 33, 123–132.Google Scholar
Born, M. (1954). Dynamical Theory of Crystal Lattices. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Egerton, R.F. (1979). K-shell ionization cross-sections for use in microanalysis. Ultramicroscopy 4, 169–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egerton, R.F. (2013). Prospects for vibrational EELS with high spatial resolution. Microsc Microanal.Google Scholar
Geiger, J. & Wittmack, K. (1965). Wirkungsquerschnitte fur die Anregung von Molekulschwingungen durch schnelle Elektronen. Z Physik 187, 433–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hashimoto, H., Howie, A. & Whelan, M.J. (1962). Anomalous electron absorption effects in metal foils: Theory and comparison with experiment. Proc Roy Soc A269, 80–103.Google Scholar
Herring, R.A. (2006). Coherence measurements of zero-loss, plasmon-loss and phonon-loss electrons and their contribution to the Stobbs factor. Ultramicroscopy 106, 960–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hytch, M.J. & Stobbs, W.M. (1994). Quantitative comparison of high resolution TEM images with image simulations. Ultramicroscopy 53, 191–203.Google Scholar
Kittel, C. (1986). Introduction to Solid State Physics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Krivanek, O.L., Lovejoy, T.C., Delby, N. & Carpenter, R.W. (2013a). Monochromated STEM with a 30 meV-wide, atom-sized electron probe. Microscopy 62(1), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krivanek, O.L., Lovejoy, T.C., Murfitt, M.F., Skone, G., Batson, P.E., Delby, N., Rez, D., Rez, P. & Grant, I.P. (2013b). Advances in monochromated STEM and EELS, EMAG. York, I.O.P.Google Scholar
Lambert, J.B. & Shurvell, H.F. et al. (1998). Organic Structural Spectroscopy. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Mook, H.W. & Kruit, P. (1999). On the monochromatisation of high brightness electron sources for electron microscopy. Ultramicroscopy 78, 43–51.Google Scholar
Mott, N.F. & Massey, H.S.W. (1965). The Theory of Atomic Collisions. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Palik, E.D. (1985). Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rez, D., Rez, P. et al. (1994). Dirac-Fock calculations of X-ray scattering factors and contributions to the mean inner potential for electron scattering. Acta Cryst A 50, 481–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rez, P. (1983). The contrast of defects in inelastically scattered electrons. Acta Cryst A 39, 697–706.Google Scholar
Rez, P. (1993). Does phonon scattering give high resolution images? Ultramicroscopy 52, 260–266.Google Scholar
Rez, P. (2001). Scattering cross sections in electron microscopy and analysis. Microsc Microanal 7, 356–362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed