Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T16:57:19.198Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Inner-Shell Damage Thresholds Below 1kv in Cu-Phthalocyanine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

Q. Chen
Affiliation:
Department of Physics & Astronomy, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ85287-1504
J. Spence
Affiliation:
Department of Physics & Astronomy, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ85287-1504
M. Stevens
Affiliation:
Department of Physics & Astronomy, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ85287-1504
U. Weierstall
Affiliation:
Department of Physics & Astronomy, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ85287-1504
Get access

Extract

In 1970, Breedlove and Trammel predicted that, because of radiation damage, the direct imaging of individual organic molecules by electron or X-ray microscopy was not possible. This follows from an analysis, above IkeV, of the beam energy dependence of the ratio of inelastic scattering cross sections (some of which causes damage) to elastic cross sections (used to form the image). To minimize damage, we have therefore constructed a transmission electron microscope with nanometer resolution, which operates at 7 - 300 eV, below the threshold for most inelastic processes. Recently we have obtained our first images of TMV with this instrument. Isaacson first suggested that the K-shell ionization of carbon may be the most important damage process. Although less probable than valence excitation, it dumps more energy into the system, and the decay products are highly damaging. A subsequent study of electron beam damage in several π- bonded hydrocarbon crystals down to about 200 eV showed that a damage threshold does exist at about IkeV incident energy which can be explained by the carbon K-shell ionization. (Multiple scattering increases the energy threshold from 285eV).

Type
A. Howie Symposium: Celebration of Pioneering Electron Microscopy
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Beedlove, J. and Trammel, G., Science, 170 (1970) 13101312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Spence, J., Micron 28, p. 101116 (1997). Also Weierstall, U.et al., Micron, in press(1999).Google Scholar
3.Isaacson, M.S., Physical Aspects of Electron Microscopy and Microbeam Analysis, edited by Siegel, B.M. and Beaman, D.R. (New York; Wiley) (1975) 105.Google Scholar
4.Howie, A. and Rocca, F.J., Phil. Mag. B, 52 (1985)751757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Howie, A., et al., Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser.; 90 (EMAG 87) (1987) 155157.Google Scholar
6.Cartier, E., Pfluger, P., Pireaux, J. and Rei Vilar., M.Appl Phys. A44, (1987) p. 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Supported by ARO award DAAH04-96-1 -0231Google Scholar