Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T10:55:55.138Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In-Depth Imaging Using Two-Photon Excitation Microscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

H.C. Gerritsen
Affiliation:
Debye Institute, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80.000, 3508, TA, Utrecht, Netherlands
J.M. Vroom
Affiliation:
Debye Institute, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80.000, 3508, TA, Utrecht, Netherlands
C.J. de Grauw
Affiliation:
Debye Institute, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80.000, 3508, TA, Utrecht, Netherlands
Get access

Extract

Two-Photon Excitation (TPE) microscopy is a powerful tool for the imaging of biological specimen. The most important advantages compared with conventional confocal microscopy are: intrinsic optical sectioning, reduced phototoxcicity and photobleaching, and an increased penetration into the specimen. The increased penetration arises from the use of the longer wavelength excitation light, in the red or near infra-red.

Here, a quantitative in-depth TPE imaging study is presented on dental biofilm. The biofilm contains a mixed culture of a large number of oral bacteria with a typical size of ≈ 1 μm diameter. They exhibit a complex microstructure and heterogeneous physiological and biochemical properties. The high density of the biofilms limits the depth range over which confocal images can be acquired to 25-40 μm.

Using a two-photon excitation microscope fluorescence intensity images could be recorded over the whole thickness (100 μm) of the biofilm sample.

Type
New Developments in Multi-Photon Excitation Microscopy
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Denk, et a l ., Science, 248, 7376, (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Singleton, et al., The life and death of biofilm. ed. Wimpenny, Bioline, Cardiff, 3336, (1995).Google Scholar
3.Schmitt, et al., JOSA, 11, 22262235, (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Buurman, et a l ., Scanning 14, 155159, (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar