Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T02:31:17.794Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Immunocytochemical Localization of Myosin Light Chains in the Abdominal Superficial Flexor Muscles of the American Lobster, Homarus Americanus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

Lisa D. Brown
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physiology and Neurobiology, The University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT06269
Marie E. Cantino
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physiology and Neurobiology, The University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT06269
Get access

Extract

Myosin is composed of two high-molecular weight heavy chains and four low-molecular weight hght chains. In both vertebrate and invertebrate skeletal muscle, each myosin heavy chain is associated with two myosin light chains. In skeletal muscle myosins studied by X-ray diffraction, each myosin heavy chain binds one of each of two distinct classes of hght chains. Thus, while isoform distributions may vary within and between fibers, the spatial distribution of each class of light chain should be uniform within the A band and between sarcomeres and fibers. Since no such study exists for crustacean myosin, we investigated the spatial distribution of the hght chains within the superficial flexor muscle (SFM) of the lobster, Homarus americanus, using immunoelectron microscopy. The SFM contains two classes of myosin hght chains, termed “alpha” (Mr = 21,000 to 23,500) and “beta” (Mr = 18,000 to 18,500). Immunocytochemical electron microscopic results suggest that the alpha light chains are not uniformly distributed at the subsarcomere level.

Type
Cytochemistry (Light and Electron Histochemistry)
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References:

1.Kendrick-Jones, J., et al., J. Mol. Biol., 104 (1976) 747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Rayment, I., et al., Science, 261 (1993) 58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Xie, X., et al., Nature,368 (1994) 306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Mykles, D.L.. J. Exp. Zool., 234 (1985) 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Towbin, H., et al., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 76 (1979) 4350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar