Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:18:30.782Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Image-Spectroscopy: New Developments and Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

P.J. Thomas
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 3QZ, U.K.
P.A. Midgley
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 3QZ, U.K.
Get access

Extract

The ability of modern TEMs to acquire a series of energy filtered images opens up new possibilities in energy loss compositional analysis. In particular, an electron spectroscopic imaging (ESI) series may be treated as a 2-D array of spectra whose resolution is dictated by the step size of the image series, as illustrated in Fig (a). This allows standard spectroscopic analysis techniques to be used on the extracted ‘image-spectra’, such as the removal of plural scattering by deconvolution. Examples of this are given in Fig (b) and (c), which show how Fourier-log and Fourier-ratio deconvolution can be used to recover the single scattering distribution (SSD) from both the low-loss and core-loss regions from a Cr specimen. A pure elemental sample is ideal for testing the validity of such analysis techniques for quantitative compositional mapping, and more details of this method will be published elsewhere. Further, for many simple metal systems, such as steels and alloys, and for simple semiconductors it is possible to model the plasmon contribution using a simple Drude-Lorentz model.

Type
Compositional Imaging and Spectroscopy
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Mayer, J.et.alMicron 28 (1997) 361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Thomas, P.J. and Midgley, P.A. (in preparation)Google Scholar
3.Thomas, P.J. and Midgley, P.A., Proc. 14th Int. Congr. Elec. Microsc. 1 (1998) 249Google Scholar
4.Jeanguillaume, C. and Colliex, C., Ultramicroscopy, 28 (1989) 252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. We would like to acknowledge financial support given by the EPSRC and by BNFL Magnox Generation.Google Scholar