Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T03:28:13.438Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How accurate is ALCHEMI for ordering measurements?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

Nan Jiang*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ85287
Get access

Abstract

Atom location by channeling-enhanced microanalysis (ALCHEMI) promises a straightforward measurement of ordering in materials. On tilting the electron beam in a transmission electron microscope (TEM) about a superlattice Bragg position the electron channeling changes, weighting X-ray production from each of the sublattices differently. The overall X-ray signal, converted to an apparent composition via a kinematical non-channeling standardization, moves between the composition of the constitute sublattices. However, the accuracy of measurement always bothers many researchers. Results may vary from time to time, and in the worse cases, the composition outputs are nonsense. Table 1 gives an example of a series of ALCHEMIC measurements in a B2 Ti50Al42Mo8 intermetallic alloy.

In general, two major sources cause errors in ALCHEMI: weak channeling and delocalization effects. The later only results in “systematic errors”, which can always be corrected or reduced by theoretical calculations. However, it is difficult to improve the error due to weak channeling.

Type
Atom Location by Channeling Enhancement of X-Ray and EELS Signals (ALCHEMI)(organized by J.Spence)
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Spence, J. C. H. and Taft∅, J., J. Microsco. 130 (1983) 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Hou, D. H., Jones, I. P., and Fraser, H. L., Phil. Mag. A 74 (1996) 741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Oxley, M. P. and Allen, L. J., Acta Cryst. A 56 (2000) 470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Jiang, N., et al. Phil. Mag. A 79 (1999) 2525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Jones, I. P., Phil. Mag. 33 (1976) 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. This work was supported by the Overseas Research Scholarships (UK) and NSF DMR 9814055.Google Scholar