Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T20:32:17.733Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Going Nondispersive

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2005

Kurt F.J. Heinrich
Affiliation:
804 Blossom Drive, Rockville, MD 20850
Ray Fitzgerald
Affiliation:
8422 La Jolla Shores Drive, La Jolla, CA 92037
Klaus Keil
Affiliation:
Hawaii Institute of Geophysics and Planetology, SOEST, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Manoa, HI 96822
Get access

Abstract

The energy-dispersive Si(Li) X-ray spectrometer, introduced 30 years ago into electron probe mi-croanalysis (EPMA) by R. Fitzgerald et al., has profoundly affected the development of microanalysis. It offers many advantages over the wavelength-dispersive crystal spectrometer. It has no moving parts and covers the full energy range of interest in EPMA. There is no defocusing over large distances on the specimen, the efficiency of the device is high, varies slowly and continuously with atomic number, and can be predicted fairly accurately, and, most importantly, all emission lines are detected and can be observed simultaneously. The one remaining disadvantage of the Si(Li) spectrometer is its poorer energy resolution. Solid-state detection devices now under development promise to achieve resolution comparable to that of the crystal spectrometer.

Type
1998 TOPICAL SYMPOSIUM OF THE MICROBEAM ANALYSIS SOCIETY
Copyright
© 2005 Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)