Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T19:38:31.237Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Environmental Optimization for Sub-0.2NM Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

D. A. Muller
Affiliation:
Bell Labs, Lucent Technologies, 600 Mountain Ave, Murray Hill, NJ07974
J. Grazul
Affiliation:
Bell Labs, Lucent Technologies, 600 Mountain Ave, Murray Hill, NJ07974
F. H. Baumann
Affiliation:
Bell Labs, Lucent Technologies, 600 Mountain Ave, Murray Hill, NJ07974
R. Hynes
Affiliation:
JEOL USA, 700 Mountain Ave, Murray Hill, NJ07974
T. L. Hoffman
Affiliation:
JEOL USA, 700 Mountain Ave, Murray Hill, NJ07974
Get access

Extract

Sub-0.2 nm probes can now be readily obtained on Schottky field-emission microscopes[1]. However environmental instabilities are proving to be the limiting factors for atomic resolution spectroscopy and distortion-free annular-dark field imaging, as a result of the long acquisition times (comparable to those required for inline holography[2]), and from the serial nature of the scanning system where instabilities result in image distortions rather than reductions in contrast. Troubleshooting the two most common environmental problems are discussed here.

Electromagnetic interference can cause beam deflections in both the scanning system and the spectrometer [3](< 0.3 mG r.ms for 0.3nm, < 0.2 mG for 0.2 nm). These are most easily dealt with before the machine is installed, as substantial rewiring may be necessary. There is little that can be done about quasi-DC fields, such as from elevators and nearby trains and buses. Major sources of AC electromagnetic interference are unbalanced electrical loads.

Type
The Theory and Practice of Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.James, E. M., Browning, N. D., Ultramicroscopy 78 (1999) 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Turner, J. H., O'Keefe, M. A. and Mueller, Robert, Proc. Microsc. Microanal. 3(2) (1997)1177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Hethenngton, C.J.D. et al., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 523 (1998) 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar