Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T04:27:47.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electron Backscatter Diffraction (EBSD) of Sub 500 Nm Particles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

J. Small
Affiliation:
NIST, Stop 8371, Gaithersburg, MD20899
J. Michael
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM87185-1405
Get access

Abstract

In our initial studies of the phase identification analysis of individual particles by EBSD, we observed that the quality of the EBSD patterns obtained from particles less than 1 micrometer in size decreased with decreasing particle size, density, and atomic number. This effect is shown in FIG. 1 by comparison of an EBSD pattern from a 12 um Al2O3 particle (FIG. la) and a 200 nm Al2O3 particle FIG. lb. Both particles were mounted on 2 mm thick carbon substrates. The Kikuchi bands from the larger particle are clearly visible while the bands from the smaller particle are not. This decrease in image quality is believed to be the result of a combination of 2 factors related to the electron scattering associated with these very small particles. First, as particle size decreases below about 1 micrometer, an increasing number of electrons are transmitted through the bottom of the particles.

Type
Diffraction Techniques in TEM and SEM
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Small, J. A. and Michael, J. R.. Journal of Microscopy #201 VOL(l) (2001) 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. JRM was supported by the United States Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC04- 94AL85000. Sandia is a multiprogram laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company, for the United States Department of Energy.Google Scholar