Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:55:57.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of the Insertion and Polymerization Technique in Composite Resin Restorations: Analysis of Marginal Gap by Atomic Force Microscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2010

Marcos Aurélio Bomfim da Silva ,
Guilherme José Pimentel Lopes de Oliveira ,
Josealdo Tonholo ,
José Ginaldo da Silva Júnior ,
Lucineide de Melo Santos  and
José Ivo Limeira dos Reis
Marcos Aurélio Bomfim da Silva
Affiliation:
Departamento de Odontologia Restauradora, Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 13414-903, Piracicaba-SP, Brazil
Guilherme José Pimentel Lopes de Oliveira*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Diagnóstico e Cirurgia, Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara, Universidade Estadual Paulista, 14801-140 Araraquara-SP, Brazil
Josealdo Tonholo
Affiliation:
Instituto de Química e Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Campus A. C. Simões, Tabuleiro do Martins, 57072-970 Maceió-AL, Brazil
José Ginaldo da Silva Júnior
Affiliation:
Instituto de Química e Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Campus A. C. Simões, Tabuleiro do Martins, 57072-970 Maceió-AL, Brazil
Lucineide de Melo Santos
Affiliation:
Faculdade de Odontologia, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Campus A. C. Simões, Tabuleiro do Martins, 57072-970 Maceió-AL, Brazil
José Ivo Limeira dos Reis
Affiliation:
Faculdade de Odontologia, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Campus A. C. Simões, Tabuleiro do Martins, 57072-970 Maceió-AL, Brazil
*
Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This in vitro study evaluated the marginal gap at the composite tooth/resin interface in class V cavities under the influence of two insertion techniques and a curing system by means of atomic force microscopy (AFM). Forty enamel and dentin cavities were prepared on the buccal surface in bovine teeth with quadratic forms measuring 2 mm × 2 mm and depth of 1.5 mm. The teeth were then divided into four groups: group A, 10 cavities were restored in one increment, light cured by halogen light; group B, 10 cavities filled with bulk filling, light cured by the light emitting diodes (LED); group C, 10 cavities were restored by the incremental technique, light cured by halogen light; group D, 10 cavities were restored by the incremental technique, light cured by the LED. The teeth underwent the polishing procedure and were analyzed by AFM for tooth/restoration interface evaluation. The data were compared between groups using the nonparametric Kruskall-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests (p < 0.05). The results showed a statistically significant difference between groups A and B and groups A and C. It was concluded that no insertion and polymerization technique was able to completely seal the cavity.

Keywords

dental marginal adaptationdental curing lightatomic force microscopycomposite resinlasersdental surface analysis
Type
Atomic Force Microscopy Biological Applications
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 16 , Issue 6 , December 2010 , pp. 779 - 784
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Batista, L.H.C., Silva, J.G. Jr., Silva, M.F.A. & Tonholo, J. (2007). Atomic force microscopy of removal of dentin smear layers. Microsc Microanal 13, 245–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beznos, C. (2001). Microleakage at the cervical margin of composite class II cavities with different restorative techniques. Oper Dent 26, 60–69.Google ScholarPubMed
Botta, A.C., Duarte, S. Jr., Paulin Filho, P.I. & Gheno, S.M. (2008). Effect of dental finishing instruments on the surface roughness of composite resins as elucidated by atomic force microscopy. Microsc Microanal 14, 380–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braga, R.R., Ballester, R.Y. & Ferracane, J.L. (2005). Factors involved in the development of polymerization shrinkage stress in resin-composites: A systematic review. Dent Mater 21, 962–970.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braga, R.R., Boaro, L.C.C., Kuroe, T., Azevedo, C.L.N. & Singer, J.M. (2006). Influence of cavity dimensions and their derivatives (volume and ‘C’ factor) on shrinkage stress development and microleakage of composite restorations. Dent Mater 22, 818–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braga, R.R. & Ferracane, J.L. (2004). Alternatives in polymerization contraction stress management. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 15, 176–184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cavalcante, L.M.A., Peris, A.R., Ambrosano, G.M.B., Ritter, A.V. & Pimenta, L.A.F. (2007). Effect of photoactivation systems and resin composites on the microleakage of esthetic restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract 8, 70–79.Google ScholarPubMed
Chikawa, H., Inai, N., Cho, E., Kishikawa, R., Otsuki, M., Foxton, R.M. & Tagami, J. (2006). Effect of incremental filling technique on adhesion of light-cured resin composite to cavity floor. Dent Mater J 25, 503–508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duarte, S. Jr., Dinelli, W. & da Silva, M.H. (2007). Influence of resin composite insertion technique in preparations with a high C-factor. Quintessence Int 38, 829–835.Google ScholarPubMed
Eliades, G., Palaghias, G. & Vougiouklakis, G. (1997). Effect of acid conditioners on dentin morphology, molecular composition and collagen conformation in situ. Dent Mater 13, 24–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feilzer, A.J., De Dee, A.J. & Davidson, C.L. (1987). Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 66, 1636–1639.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Félix, S.A., González-López, S., Mauricio, P.D., Aguilar-Mendoza, J.A. & Bolanos-Carmoña, M.V. (2007). Effects of filling techniques on the regional bond strength to lateral walls in Class I cavities. Oper Dent 32, 602–609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hardan, L.S., Amm, E.W. & Ghayad, A. (2008). Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of class II restorations. Odontostomatol Trop 31, 27–34.Google ScholarPubMed
Hasler, C., Zimmerli, B. & Luss, A. (2006). Curing capability of halogen and LED light curing units in deep class II cavities. Oper Dent 31, 354–363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
He, Z., Shimada, Y. & Tagami, J. (2007). The effects of cavity size and incremental technique on micro-tensile bond strength of resin composite in class I cavities. Dent Mater 23, 533–538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kakaboura, A., Fragouli, M., Rahiotis, C. & Silikas, N. (2007). Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter. J Mater Sci Mater Med 18, 155–163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kubo, S., Yokota, H., Yokota, H. & Hayashi, Y. (2004). The effect of light-curing modes on the microleakage of cervical resin composite restorations. J Dent 32, 247–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuijs, R.H., Fennis, W.M., Kreulen, C.M., Barink, M. & Verdonschot, N. (2003). Does layering minimize shrinkage stresses in composite restorations? J Dent Res 82, 967–971.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lazarchik, D.A., Hammond, B.D., Sikes, C.L., Looney, S.W. & Rueggeberg, F.A. (2007). Hardness comparison of bulk-filled/transtooth and incremental-filled/occlusally irradiated composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 98, 129–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindberg, A., Peutzfeldt, A. & Van Dijken, J.W. (2005). Effect of power density of curing unit, exposure duration and light guide distance on composite depth of cure. Clin Oral Investig 9, 71–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magni, E., Zhang, F., Hickel, R., Bosso, M., Polemini, A. & Ferrari, M. (2008). SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing. J Dent 36, 885–891.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miles, M., Antognozzi, M., Haschke, H., Hobbs, J., Humphris, A. & McMaster, T. (2003). Tour de force microscopy. Mater Today 6, 30–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moszner, N. & Salz, U. (2001). New developments of polymeric dental composites. Prog Polym Sci 26, 535–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niu, W., Eto, J.N., Kimura, Y., Takeda, F.H. & Matsumoto, H. (1998). A study on microleakage after resin filling of class II cavities prepared by Er:YAG laser. J Clin Laser Med Surg 16, 227–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, S., Pugach, M., Hilton, J., Watanabe, L., Marshall, S.J. & Marshall, G.W. Jr. (2003). The influence of the dentin smear layer on adhesion: A self-etching primer vs. a total-etch system. Dent Mater 19, 758–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, J., Chang, J., Ferracane, J. & Lee, I.B. (2008). How should composite be layered to reduce shrinkage stress: Incremental or bulk filling? Dent Mater 24, 1501–1505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pfeifer, C.S.C., Ruggiero, R.B. & Cardoso, E.C. (2006). Influence of cavity dimensions, insertion technique and adhesive system on microleakage of Class V restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 137, 197–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saeki, K., Marshall, S.J., Gansky, S.A. & Marshall, G.W. Jr. (2001). Etching characteristics of dentin: Effect of ferric chloride in citric acid. J Oral Rehabil 28, 301–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santos, G.B., Medeiros, I.S., Fellows, C.E., Muench, A. & Braga, R.R. (2007). Composite depth of cure obtained with QTH and LED units assessed by microhardness and micro-Raman spectroscopy. Oper Dent 31, 79–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sensi, L.G., Marson, F.C., Baratieri, L.N. & Junior, S.M. (2005). Effect of placement techniques on the marginal adaptation of class V composite restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract 4, 17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, M.F.A., Davies, R.M., Stewart, B., Devizio, W., Tonholo, J., Silva, J.G. Jr. & Pretty, I.A. (2006). Effect of whitening gels on the surface roughness of restorative materials in situ. Dent Mater 22, 919–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takamizawa, T., Yamamoto, A., Inoue, N., Tsujimoto, A., Oto, T., Irokawa, A., Tsubota, K. & Miyazaki, M. (2008). Influence of light intensity on contraction stress of flowable resins. J Oral Sci 50, 37–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uctasli, S., Tezvergil, A., Lassila, L.V.J. & Vallittu, P.K. (2005). The degree of conversion of fiber-reinforced composites polymerized using different light-curing sources. Dent Mater 21, 469–475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Versluis, A., Douglas, W.H., Cross, M. & Sakaguchi, R.L. (1996). Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses? J Dent Res 75, 871–878.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waldman, G.L., Vaidynathan, T.K. & Vaidynathan, J. (2008). Microleakage and dentin-to-resin interface morphology of pre-etching versus self-etching adhesive systems. Open Dent J 28, 120–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xie, H., Zhang, F., Wu, Y., Chen, C. & Liu, W. (2008). Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement. Aust Dent J 53, 325–331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yap, A.U.J. (2000). Effectiveness of polymerization in composite restoratives claiming bulk placement: Impact of cavity depth and exposure time. Oper Dent 25, 113–120.Google ScholarPubMed
Yazici, A.R., Celik, C., Dayanqac, B. & Ozqunaltay, G. (2008). Effects of different light curing units modes on the microleakage of flowable composite resins. Eur J Dent 2, 240–246.Google ScholarPubMed