Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T03:45:19.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dynamin Mediates Membrane Vesiculation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

Sharon M. Sweitzer  and
Jenny E. Hinshaw
Get access

Extract

Dynamin, a 100 kDa GTPase, is essential for receptor mediated endocytosis and synaptic vesicle recycling; however its mechanism of action is unknown. The requirement for dynamin was first elucidated by the discovery that the shibire gene product in Drosophila melanogaster was homologous to mammalian dynamin-1 (1,2). The shibire flies exhibit a depletion of synaptic vesicles and an accumulation of collared clathrin-coated pits at the plasma membrane of their nerve termini (3). It was later demonstrated that endocytosis was inhibited by the overexpression of dominant negative mutants of dynamin (4,5), and that purified dynamin can self-associate to form spirals which resemble the collars of shibire and structures seen in synaptosomes treated with GTPγS (6,7). These observations led to the speculation that dynamin pinches the clathrin-coated bud from the plasma membrane. In support of this hypothesis, we show that purified recombinant dynamin can bind to a lipid bilayer in a regular and repeating pattern to form helical tubes which vesiculate upon the addition of GTP.

Type
Dynamics of Cellular Membrane Traffic
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 4 , Issue S2: Proceedings: Microscopy & Microanalysis '98, Microscopy Society of America 56th Annual Meeting, Microbeam Analysis Society 32nd Annual Meeting, Atlanta, Georgia July 12-16, 1998 , July 1998 , pp. 1022 - 1023
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Chen, M. S., et al. Nature 351, 583–586 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2. van der Bliek, A. M., & Meyerowitz, E. M. Nature 351, 411–414 (1991).Google Scholar

3. Koenig, J. H., & Ikeda, K.J Neurosci 9, 3844–3860 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4. van der Bliek, A. M., et al. J Cell Biol 122, 553–563 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5. Damke, H., et al. J Cell Biol 127, 915–934 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6. Hinshaw, J. E., & Schmid, S. L.Nature 374, 190–192 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7. Takei, K., et al. Nature 374, 186–190 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8. Nuoffer, C, & Balch, W. E.Annu Rev Biochem 63, 949–990 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9. Roos, J., & Kelly, R. B.Trends in Cell Biology 7, 257–259 (1997).Google Scholar