Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T03:43:04.474Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dual-Labeled Probes for Fluorescence and Electron Microscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

Richard D. Powell
Affiliation:
Nanoprobes, Incorporated, Stony Brook, NY11790
Carol M. R. Halsey
Affiliation:
Nanoprobes, Incorporated, Stony Brook, NY11790
Edmund Gutierrez
Affiliation:
Nanoprobes, Incorporated, Stony Brook, NY11790
James F. Hainfeld
Affiliation:
Nanoprobes, Incorporated, Stony Brook, NY11790
Frederic R. Furuya
Affiliation:
Nanoprobes, Incorporated, Stony Brook, NY11790
Get access

Extract

Fluorescein and the 1.4 nm Nanogold cluster have been separately attached to polyclonal antibody Fab’ fragments to generate combined fluorescent and gold secondary antibody probes (1, 2), and in comparisons with Nanogold, colloidal gold and fluorescein-labeled secondary antibodies, neither label was found to be significantly compromised by the presence of the other. The proximity to a gold label with which a fluorophore retains sufficient fluorescence emission intensity to be useful is limited by non-radiative fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) (3). This is a function of the degree of overlap of the fluorophore emission spectrum with the metal particle absorbtion spectrum, and of the separation of the metal particle and the fluorophore (4); for an effective dual-labeled probe, separation should be greater than the Forster distance (3), at which 50 % of excited-state decay occurs by FRET.

Type
Recent Advances in Labeling Techniques
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References:

1.Powell, R. D. et al., J. Histochem. Cytochem. 45 (1997) 947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Robinson, J. M. and Vandré, D. D.. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 45 (1997) 631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Wu, P. and Brand, L.. Anal. Biochem. 218 (1994) 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Forster., Th., Ann. Physik., 2 (1948) 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Powell, R. D. et al., Proc. Ann MSA Meeting, 54 (1996) 892.Google Scholar
6.Tomalia, D. A., Naylor, A. M. and Goddard III, W. A., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Eng., 29 (1990), 138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. This work was supported by NIH grants 2R44 GM49564 and 1R44 GM56090.Google Scholar