Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T17:10:35.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Diffraction Channeling and the Production of Secondary Excitation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

S.J. Pennycook*
Affiliation:
solid State Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, P.O.Box 2008, Oak Ridge, TN37831
Get access

Extract

The pivotal role played by Archie Howie in the development of many areas of electron microscopy is universary acknowledged.Here I would like to highlight his contribution to the quantitative description of secondary excitations, which was an important influence on the development of Z-contrast imaging in zone-axis crystals. Secondary excitations are those such as x-ray emission which occur following a primary scattering event, in this case excitation of inner shell electrons. The first important concept to be realized by Archie was that dynamical diffraction and channeling are different manifestations of the same physical effect, namely, the multiple scattering of electrons within a crystal. Second was the realization that processes which are localized within the unit cell will show a dependence on diffraction conditions, such as incident beam orientation, and could therefore be described quantitatively using dynamical diffraction theory. Precisely the same theory was used to describe the orientation dependence of cathodoluminescence

The development of the STEM for high resolution imaging was of course due primarily to Crewe and coworkers, with an annular detector to allow efficient detection of elastic scattering over a wide angular range.

Type
A. Howie Symposium: Celebration of Pioneering Electron Microscopy
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Howie, A., Phil. Mag. 14, 223 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Cherns, D., Howie, A., and Jacobs, M.H., Ultramicroscopy 21, 277 (1987)Google Scholar

3 Pennycook, S.J. and Howie, A., Philos. Mag. 41, 809 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Crewe, A.V., Wall, J.and Langmore, J., Science 168, 1338 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 Isaacson, M.S., Ohtsuki, M., and Utlaut, M., in: Introduction to Analytical Electron Microscopy, (Plenum, New York, 1979), p. 343CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Donald, A.M.and Brown, L.M., Acta Met. 27, 59 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Treacy, M.M.J., Howie, A., and Wilson, C.J., Phil. Mag. 38, 569 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 Howie, A., J. Microsc. 117, 11 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9 Treacy, M.M.J., Howie, A., and Pennycook, S.J., in Electron Microscopy and Analysis, 1979, (Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. No. 52, Institute of Physics, London and Bristol, 1980) p. 261Google Scholar

10 Ade, G., Optik 49, 113(1977)Google Scholar

11 Engel, A., Wiggins, J.W., and Woodruff, D.C., J. Appl. Phys. 45, 2739 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12 Lord, Rayleigh, Phil. Mag. (5) 42, 167 (1896)Google Scholar

13 Cowley, J.M., in Principles of Analytical Electron Microscopy, (Plenum Press, New York, 1986), p. 343Google Scholar

14 Pennycook, S.J., Berger, S.D., and Culbertson, R.J., J. Microsc. 144, 229 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15 Pennycook, S.J. and Boatner, L.A., Nature 336, 565 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16 Pennycook, S.J. and Jesson, D.E., Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 938 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17 Loane, R.F., Xu, P., and Silcox, J., Ultramicroscopy 40, 121 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18 Nellist, P.D., and Pennycook, S.J., Ultramicroscopy, in pressGoogle Scholar

19 Nellist, P.D., and Pennycook, S.J., J. Microscopy 190, 159 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

20 Pennycook, S.J., et al., Handbook of Microscopy, (VCH Publishers, Weinheim, Germany, 1997), p. 595Google Scholar

21 Duscher, G., Browning, N.D., and Pennycook, S.J., Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) 166, 327 (1998)3.0.CO;2-R>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

22 Ritchie, R.H. and Howie, A., Phil. Mag. A 58, 753767 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

23 Nellist, P.D. and Pennycook, S.J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4156 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

24 Krivanek, O.L., Dellby, N. and Lupini, A.R., these proceedings. This research was sponsored by the Division of Materials Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy, under contract DE-AC05-96OR22464 with Lockheed Martin Energy Research CorpGoogle Scholar