Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T17:08:18.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diagnosis of Magnification Stability and Non-Linearity in SEMs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

A. Sicignano ,
D. Eremin  and
A. V. Nikitin
A. Sicignano
Affiliation:
Nanometrology LLC, Ardsley Park Science and Technology Center, Ardsley, New York
D. Eremin
Affiliation:
Nanometrology LLC, Ardsley Park Science and Technology Center, Ardsley, New York
A. V. Nikitin
Affiliation:
Nanometrology LLC, Ardsley Park Science and Technology Center, Ardsley, New York
Get access

Extract

Summary: In recent years the SEM has advanced from an instrument used primarily for imaging to a tool for performing precise and accurate measurements of features. The SEM has been widely adapted by workers in diverse technical fields such as: integrated circuit (IC) processing, micro electro-mechanical devices (MEMs) design and molecular biology research. The SEM user in need of acquiring accurate dimensional information about their samples normally relies on the magnification readings and settings provided by the instrument maker. Tools to evaluate the precision of these physical dimensions or to assist in understanding the state of the SEM are not currently available. This paper presents a new methodology based on novel software and hardware to provide the user with capability of diagnosing the magnification stability and non-linearity of their SEMs prior to attempting accurate and precise feature measurements. Examples will be presented demonstrating the diagnosis of magnification stability and non-linearity in SEMs located at 4 independent sites.

Type
Instrument Performance
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 6 , Issue S2: Proceedings: Microscopy & Microanalysis 2000, Microscopy Society of America 58th Annual Meeting, Microbeam Analysis Society 34th Annual Meeting, Microscopical Society of Canada/Societe de Microscopie de Canada 27th Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania August 13-17, 2000 , August 2000 , pp. 1132 - 1133
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References:

1.Sicignano, A.. In Situ Differential Scanning Electron Microscopy Design and Application, Philips J. Res. 47 (1993) 163.Google Scholar
2.Cousens, D. R., Kinaev, N. N., Ranashinge, M., Reproducibility and Accuracy of Spatial Measurements from Digitally Captured Images in the Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope, Scanning 20 (1998) 83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Vladar, A. E., Postek, M. T., Davilla, S. D.,Zs Your Scanning Electron Microscope Hi-Fi? Scanning Vol. 17 (1995) 286.Google Scholar
4.Ilyin, M. Y., et al, High Accuracy and Precision Measurements of Line Dimensions of Sub-0.25-Micron and Nanometer Objects in Scanning Electron Microscopy, SCANNING, 19,3 (1997) 224.Google Scholar
5.Ballard, D. B., A Procedure for Calibrating the Magnification of a Scanning Electron Microscope Using NRS SRM 484, NIST SBSIR 77-1248 (1977).Google Scholar