Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:44:28.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CTF Correction in Electron Tomography of Insect Flight Muscle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

Hanspeter Winkler  and
Kenneth A. Taylor
Hanspeter Winkler
Affiliation:
Institute of Molecular Biophysics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, 32306-4380
Kenneth A. Taylor
Affiliation:
Institute of Molecular Biophysics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, 32306-4380
Get access

Abstract

In order to extend the resolution available in electron tomograms, we have been experimenting with various deconvolution procedures that will ultimately enable correction of the focus gradient thereby allowing the resolution to be extended to beyond the first zero in the contrast transfer function (CTF). This effort requires first a determination of the amount of amplitude and phase contrast in the typical specimen used by us.

For the determination of the percentage of amplitude contrast a focus series of 19 images was taken at a magnification of 13500 on a CM300. The micrographs were digitized on a PDS scanner, the pixel size was 0.888 nm. After correction of translational shifts, rotations, and defocus dependent magnification differences the image restoration was carried out according to [1,2]. From the resulting complex wave function an averaged amplitude contrast amount of 18% was obtained for the stained specimen. The phase contrast part and amplitude contrast part are shown in Figs, 1b, and 1c, respectively, and can be compared with the micrograph taken at 960 nm underfocus (Fig. 1a).

Type
Electron Tomography: Recent Advances and Applications (Organized by M. Marko)
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 7 , Issue S2: Proceedings: Microscopy & Microanalysis 2001, Microscopy Society of America 59th Annual Meeting, Microbeam Analysis Society 35th Annual Meeting, Long Beach, California August 5-9, 2001 , August 2001 , pp. 108 - 109
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

references

[1]Saxton, W. O., Scanning Microscopy Suppl. 2 (1988) 213–224Google Scholar
[2]Saxton, W. O., Ultramicroscopy 55 (1994) 171–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Taylor, K. A.et al., J. Struct. Biol. 120 (1997) 372–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]van Heel, M.et al., Ultramicroscopy 46 (1992) 307–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Saxton, W. O., J. Microscopy 174 (1994) 61–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar