Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T04:13:16.090Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cryo-Electron Microscopy of Aura Viruses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

W. Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN47907-1392
N. H. Olson
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN47907-1392
B. R. McKinney
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN47907-1392
R. J. Kuhn
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN47907-1392
T. S. Baker
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN47907-1392
Get access

Extract

Alphaviruses are a group of enveloped viruses in the Togaviridae family. Studies of several alphaviruses, including Ross River, Sindbis and Semliki Forest viruses, by cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM), three-dimensional (3D) image resconstruction and other techniques have illustrated that these spherical viruses have a T=4, multi-layered structure.

Aura virus, which is closely related to Sindbis, was first isolated in South America. Unlike the other alphaviruses, both genomic RNA (12kb, 49S) and subgenomic RNA(4.2kb, 26S) are encapsidated efficiently and form mature virions. Studies on negatively-stained virus particles demonstrated that there are two major size classes. The first contains particles of ∼72nm diameter, which are most similar to wild type virus, whereas the second class includes particles of ∼62nm in diameter. The 72nm particles are believed to have one copy of genomic RNA or one to three copies of subgenomic RNA, and a T=4 structure. The 62nm particles probably only have a single copy of subgenomic RNA and are presumed to be T=3 structures.

Type
Imaging of Macromolecular Complexes
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References:

1.Strauss, J. H. and Strauss, E. G., Microbiol. Rev., 58(1994)491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Cheng, R. H. et al., Cell, 80(1995)621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Paredes, A. M. et al., J. Virol., 72(1998)1534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Venien-Bryan, C. and Fuller, S. D., J. Mol. Biol., 236(1994)572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Rumenapf, T. et al., J. Virol, 68(1994)56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Rumenapf, T. et al., J. Virol, 69(1995)1741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Olson, N. H. et al., J. Struct. Biol, 105(1990)111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Baker, T. S. and Cheng, R. H, J. Struct. Biol, 116(1996)120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Fuller, S. D. et al., J. Struct. Biol, 116(1996)48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Conway, J. F. et al., Nature, 386(1997)91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. We thank J. Strauss for stimulating the initiation of this study and R. Ashmore for help with programming. Work supported in part by grants from the NIH (GM-33050) and NSF (MCR- 9527131) to TSB and NIH (6M-56279 and AI-33982) to RJK.Google Scholar