Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T22:53:19.535Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Correlative Neutron Activation and TEM to Determine the Uptake Mechanism and Distribution of Orally Administered Colloidal Gold Nanoparticles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

J.F. Hillyer
Affiliation:
Dept. of Animal Health & Biomedical Sciences, U. of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI53706
R.M. Albrecht
Affiliation:
Dept. of Animal Health & Biomedical Sciences, U. of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI53706
Get access

Extract

The uptake of insoluble, particulate matter through the digestive tract occurs in low quantities, and the pathway and amount of particle uptake is size dependent. Previous studies have shown that the uptake of nanoparticles occurs mainly through the Peyer's patch regions of the small intestine while micrometer sized particles enter the body by a process called persorption: the paracellular uptake of microparticles from the digestive tract into the body. These studies have also shown that translocation is largely dependent on particle size: smaller particles are more readily absorbed. Research on the use of microparticles for the oral delivery of drugs, vaccines, and DNA have shown that protein, polysaccharide, and DNA microparticle encapsulation can increase uptake and bioavailability of absorbed molecules. All of these studies have used particles with diameters ranging from 0.1 to 10 μm. Metallic colloidal gold particles can be synthesized in sizes much smaller than micro- and nanoparticles currently being tested for drug delivery.

Type
Microscopy and Microanalysis in the Pharmaceutical Industry
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Florence, A. T., Pharm. Res. 14: 259266 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2. Jani, P. et al., J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 41: 809812 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3. Volkheimer, G. et al., Digestion. 1: 7880 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4. Roy, K. et al., Nat. Med. 5: 387391 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5. Hillyer, J. F., Albrecht, R. M., Microsc. Microanal. 4(Suppl 2: Proceedings): 998999 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6. Hillyer, J. F., Albrecht, R. M., Microsc. Microanal. 4: 481490 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7. This research was funded in part by an NSF Minority Graduate Fellowship. We are greatful to Robinson, J., Cashwell, R., Massey, R., and Sims, P..Google Scholar