Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T01:40:40.080Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Confocal Imaging of Scale Development on Butterfly Wings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

Stephen W. Paddock*
Affiliation:
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Laboratory of Molecular Biology, University of Wisconsin, 1525 Linden Drive, Madison, WI, 53706.
Get access

Abstract

Both surfaces of the butterfly wing are covered with thousands of colored scales that are arranged in precise linear arrays. Each scale contributes a single color to the overall pattern, which is usually different on the upper and lower surface of the wing. Moreover, the scales have a characteristic surface substructure that is visible using confocal autofluorescence (fig. 1). The ridges on the surface of all of the scales function to control the flow of air across the wing surface during gliding flight, and they contribute to the interference colors in a subset of the scales.

The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is the closest relative of butterflies for which detailed developmental, genetic and confocal imaging protocols have been established. Specimen preparation techniques for butterfly imaginal discs were largely developed from those for Drosophila tissues. The various stages of butterfly wing development have presented new challenges for confocal imaging. For example, butterfly fifth instar wing imaginal discs are much larger and thicker than those of the fruit fly.

Type
Challenges of Confocal Microscopy in the 21st Century (Organized by S. Paddock)
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

references

1.Carroll, S.et al.Science 265(1994)109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Brakefield, P.et al. Nature. 384(1996)236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Galant, R.et al. Current Biology 8(1998)807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Paddock, S.. Methods in Molecular Biology. Humana Press, (1998)122.Google Scholar