Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:38:12.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of Ultrastructural Morphology of Tissue fixed in Formalin and Prefer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

Steven D. Billings
Affiliation:
University Hospital Indiana University Medical Center Indianapolis, Indiana
Michael P. Goheen
Affiliation:
University Hospital Indiana University Medical Center Indianapolis, Indiana
Get access

Extract

Ultrastructural examination is sometimes necessary for diagnosis of surgical pathology material. Not uncommonly, tissue is not fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde prior to realizing that electron microscopy would be valuable or even necessary to render a diagnosis. It is well known that formalin can be an adequate fixative for ultrastructural evaluation of tissue. Increasingly, non-formalin based fixatives have become more popular with routine surgical pathology practice. Prefer, a glyoxal-based fixative, has become a popular substitute for formalin in many institutions. We are not aware of any study that has compared ultrastructural morphology of tissue fixed in formalin to tissue fixed in a glyoxal-based fixative.

To address this question, we took sections of fresh tissue from three different tumors (metastatic melanoma involving a lymph node, squamous cell carcinoma of the lung, and mixed papillary serous and clear cell carcinoma of the ovary) and fixed a portion of each in 3% glutaraldehyde, 10% neutral buffered formalin, and Prefer.

Type
Pathology
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.McDowell, E.M., in Trump, B.F. & Jones, R.T., Eds Diagnostic Electron Microscopy John Wiley & Sons (1978)115.Google Scholar