Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T10:43:19.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cell Membrane Nanostructure is Altered by Heat-Induced Antigen Retrieval: A Possible Consequence for Immunocytochemical Detection of Membranous Antigens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2019

Katerina Cizkova ,
Jakub Malohlava  and
Zdenek Tauber
Katerina Cizkova
Affiliation:
Department of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, 779 00Olomouc, Czech Republic Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, 779 00Olomouc, Czech Republic
Jakub Malohlava
Affiliation:
Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, 779 00Olomouc, Czech Republic Department of Medical Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, 779 00Olomouc, Czech Republic
Zdenek Tauber*
Affiliation:
Department of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, 779 00Olomouc, Czech Republic
*
*Author for correspondence: Zdenek Tauber, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Heat-induced antigen retrieval (HIAR) treatment improves the antigen immunodetection in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples and it can also improve the detection of intracellular antigens in alcohol-fixed cytological samples, although it could deleteriously impact immunodetection, particularly that of membranous antigens. We examined the differences in cell surface topography on MCF7 cells fixed in methanol/acetone (M/A) or 4% paraformaldehyde (4% PFA), as well as the changes caused by HIAR treatment at three different temperatures (60, 90, and 120°C), using atomic force microscopy. Furthermore, the consequences for immunostaining of five membranous antigens [epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), E-cadherin, CD9, CD24, and CD44] were examined. Our results illustrate that while there was no one single optimal immunostaining condition for the tested antibodies, the surface topography could be an important factor in successful staining. Generally, the best conditions for successful immunostaining were M/A fixation with no HIAR treatment, whereas in 4% PFA-fixed cells, HIAR treatment at 120°C was optimal. These conditions showed similarity in cell surface skewness. A correlation factor between successful immunocytochemical staining and the skewness parameter was 0.8000. Our results indicate that the presence of valleys, depressions, scratches, and pits on the cell surface is unfavorable for the successful immunodetection of cell surface antigens.

Keywords

atomic force microscopycell surface nanostructureimmunostainingmembrane antigens
Type
Biological Applications
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , February 2020 , pp. 139 - 147
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boenisch, T (2006). Heat-induced antigen retrieval: What are we retrieving? J Histochem Cytochem 54(9), 961–964.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cizkova, K, Flodrova, P, Baranova, R, Malohlava, J, Lacey, M & Tauber, Z (2018). Beneficial effect of heat-induced antigen retrieval in immunocytochemical detection of intracellular antigens in alcohol-fixed cell samples. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. doi: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000000689.Google ScholarPubMed
Cochran, JR, Kim, YS, Olsen, MJ, Bhandari, R & Wittrup, KD (2004). Domain-level antibody epitope mapping through yeast surface display of epidermal growth factor receptor fragments. J Immunol Methods 287(1–2), 147–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
D'Amico, F, Skarmoutsou, E & Stivala, F (2009). State of the art in antigen retrieval for immunohistochemistry. J Immunol Methods 341(1–2), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dapson, RW (2007). Macromolecular changes caused by formalin fixation and antigen retrieval. Biotech Histochem 82(3), 133–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denda, T, Kamoshida, S, Kawamura, J, Harada, K, Kawai, K & Kuwao, S (2012). Optimal antigen retrieval for ethanol-fixed cytologic smears. Cancer Cytopathol 120(3), 167–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denda, T, Kamoshida, S, Kawamura, J, Harada, K, Kawai, K, Kuwao, S & Sawabe, M (2013). Rapid immunocytochemistry with simple heat-induced antigen retrieval technique for improvement in the quality of cytological diagnosis. J Histochem Cytochem 61(12), 920–930.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eltoum, I, Fredenburgh, J, Myers, RB & Grizzle, WE (2001). Introduction to the theory and practice of fixation of tissues. J Histotechnol 24(3), 173–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, CB, Evers, DL, O'Leary, TJ & Mason, JT (2011). Antigen retrieval causes protein unfolding: Evidence for a linear epitope model of recovered immunoreactivity. J Histochem Cytochem 59(4), 366–381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanley, KZ, Birdsong, GG, Cohen, C & Siddiqui, MT (2009). Immunohistochemical detection of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression in breast carcinomas: Comparison on cell block, needle-core, and tissue block preparations. Cancer 117(4), 279–288.Google ScholarPubMed
Kristiansen, G, Machado, E, Bretz, N, Rupp, C, Winzer, KJ, Konig, AK, Moldenhauer, G, Marme, F, Costa, J & Altevogt, P (2010). Molecular and clinical dissection of CD24 antibody specificity by a comprehensive comparative analysis. Lab Invest 90(7), 1102–1116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langevin, HM, Cornbrooks, CJ & Taatjes, DJ (2004). Fibroblasts form a body-wide cellular network. Histochem Cell Biol 122(1), 7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leccia, F, Nardone, A, Corvigno, S, Vecchio, LD, De Placido, S, Salvatore, F & Veneziani, BM (2012). Cytometric and biochemical characterization of human breast cancer cells reveals heterogeneous myoepithelial phenotypes. Cytometry Part A 81(11), 960–972.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leong, AS & Sormunen, RT (1998). Microwave procedures for electron microscopy and resin-embedded sections. Micron 29(5), 397–409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leong, TY & Leong, AS (2007). How does antigen retrieval work? Adv Anat Pathol 14(2), 129–131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, Y, Almassalha, LM, Chandler, JE, Zhou, X, Stypula-Cyrus, YE, Hujsak, KA, Roth, EW, Bleher, R, Subramanian, H, Szleifer, I, Dravid, VP & Backman, V (2017). The effects of chemical fixation on the cellular nanostructure. Exp Cell Res 358(2), 253–259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moloney, M, McDonnell, L & O'Shea, H (2004). Atomic force microscopy of BHK-21 cells: An investigation of cell fixation techniques. Ultramicroscopy 100(3-4), 153–161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shi, SR, Shi, Y & Taylor, CR (2011). Antigen retrieval immunohistochemistry: Review and future prospects in research and diagnosis over two decades. J Histochem Cytochem 59(1), 13–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stadler, C, Skogs, M, Brismar, H, Uhlen, M & Lundberg, E (2010). A single fixation protocol for proteome-wide immunofluorescence localization studies. J Proteomics 73(6), 1067–1078.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tuttle, PVt, Rundell, AE & Webster, TJ (2006). Influence of biologically inspired nanometer surface roughness on antigen-antibody interactions for immunoassay-biosensor applications. Int J Nanomed 1(4), 497–505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vesuna, F, van Diest, P, Chen, JH & Raman, V (2008). Twist is a transcriptional repressor of E-cadherin gene expression in breast cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 367(2), 235–241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yamashita, S (2007). Heat-induced antigen retrieval: Mechanisms and application to histochemistry. Prog Histochem Cytochem 41(3), 141–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed