Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T19:18:47.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Automatic Evaluation of Collagen Fiber Directions from Polarized Light Microscopy Images

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2015

Kamil Novak*
Affiliation:
Institute of Solid Mechanics, Mechatronics and Biomechanics, Brno University of Technology, Czech Republic
Stanislav Polzer
Affiliation:
Institute of Solid Mechanics, Mechatronics and Biomechanics, Brno University of Technology, Czech Republic
Michal Tichy
Affiliation:
2nd Department of Pathology and Anatomy, St. Anne’s University Hospital, Czech Republic
Jiri Bursa
Affiliation:
Institute of Solid Mechanics, Mechatronics and Biomechanics, Brno University of Technology, Czech Republic
*
*Corresponding author. [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Mechanical properties of the arterial wall depend largely on orientation and density of collagen fiber bundles. Several methods have been developed for observation of collagen orientation and density; the most frequently applied collagen-specific manual approach is based on polarized light (PL). However, it is very time consuming and the results are operator dependent. We have proposed a new automated method for evaluation of collagen fiber direction from two-dimensional polarized light microscopy images (2D PLM). The algorithm has been verified against artificial images and validated against manual measurements. Finally the collagen content has been estimated. The proposed algorithm was capable of estimating orientation of some 35 k points in 15 min when applied to aortic tissue and over 500 k points in 35 min for Achilles tendon. The average angular disagreement between each operator and the algorithm was −9.3±8.6° and −3.8±8.6° in the case of aortic tissue and −1.6±6.4° and 2.6±7.8° for Achilles tendon. Estimated mean collagen content was 30.3±5.8% and 94.3±2.7% for aortic media and Achilles tendon, respectively. The proposed automated approach is operator independent and several orders faster than manual measurements and therefore has the potential to replace manual measurements of collagen orientation via PLM.

Type
Biological Applications and Techniques
Copyright
© Microscopy Society of America 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, J.J. (2004). The pathobiology of aortic aneurysms. J Surg Res 117, 163175.Google Scholar
Armentano, R., Simon, A., Levenson, J., Chau, N.P, Megnien, J.L. & Pichel, R. (1991). Mechanical pressure versus intrinsic effects of hypertension on large arteries in humans. Hypertension 18, 657664.Google Scholar
Arokoski, J.P., Hyttinen, M.M., Lapveteläinen, T., Takacs, P., Kosztaczky, B., Modis, L. & Helminen, H. (1996). Decreased birefringence of the superficial zone collagen network in the canine knee (stifle) articular cartilage after long distance running training, detected by quantitative polarised light microscopy. Ann Rheum Dis 55, 253264.Google Scholar
Ayres, C.E., Bowlin, G.L., Henderson, S.C., Taylor, L., Shultz, J., Alexander, J., Telemeco, T.A. & Simpson, D.G. (2006). Modulation of anisotropy in elastrospun tisuue-engineering scaffolds: Analysis of fiber alignment by the fast Fourier transform. Biomaterials 27, 55245534.Google Scholar
Bennett, H.S. (1950). Methods applicable to the study of both fresh and fixed materials: The microscopical investigation of biological materials with polarized light. In McClug’s Handbook of Microscopical Technique, McClug, J.R. (Ed.), pp. 591677. New York: PB Hoeber Inc.Google Scholar
Bromage, T.G., Goldman, H.M., McFarlin, S.C., Warshaw, J., Boyde, A. & Riggs, C.M. (2003). Circularly polarized light standards for investigations of collagen fiber orientation in bone. Anat Rec B New Anat 274, 157168.Google Scholar
Canham, P.B., Finlay, H.M., Dixon, J.G., Boughner, D.R. & Chen, A. (1989). Measurements from light and polarised light microscopy of human coronary arteries fixed at distending pressure. Cardiovasc Res 23, 973982.Google Scholar
Canham, P.B., Finlay, H.M., Dixon, J.G. & Ferguson, S.E. (1991). Layered collagen fabric of cerebral aneurysms quantitatively assessed by the universal stage and polarized light microscopy. Anat Rec 231, 579592.Google Scholar
Changoor, A., Tran-Khanh, N., Méthot, S., Garon, A., Hurtig, M.B., Shive, M.S. & Buschmann, M.D. (2011). A polarized light microscopy method for accurate and reliable grading of collagen organization in cartilage repair. Osteoarthr Cartil 19, 126135.Google Scholar
D’Amore, A., Stella, A.J., Wagner, R.W. & Sacks, M.S. (2010). Characterization of the complete fiber network topology of planar fibrous tissues and scaffolds. Biomaterials 31, 53455354.Google Scholar
Davis, E.C. (1995). Elastic lamina growth in the developing mouse aorta. J Histochem Cytochem 43, 11151123.Google Scholar
Elbischger, P.J., Bischof, H., Regitnig, P. & Holzapfel, G.A. (2004). Automatic analysis of collagen fiber orientation in the outermost layer of human arteries. Pattern Anal Applic 7, 269284.Google Scholar
Eriksen, H.A., Pajala, A., Leppilahti, J. & Risteli, J. (2002). Increased content of type III collagen at the rupture site of human Achilles tendon. J Orthop Res 20, 13521357.Google Scholar
Feldman, S.A. & Glagov, S. (1971). Transmedial collagen and elastin gradients in human aortas: Reversal with age. Atherosclerosis 13, 385394.Google Scholar
Finlay, H.M., McCullough, L. & Canham, P.B. (1995). Three-dimensional collagen organization of human brain arteries at different transmural pressures. J Vasc Res 32, 301312.Google Scholar
Flamini, V., Kerskens, C., Simms, C. & Lally, C. (2013). Fiber orientation of fresh and frozen porcine aorta determined non-invasively using diffusion tensor imaging. Med Eng Phys 35, 765776.Google Scholar
Franchi, M., Fini, M., Quaranta, M., De Pasquale, V., Raspanti, M., Giavaresi, G., Ottani, O. & Ruggeri, A. (2007). Crimp morphology in relaxed and stretched rat Achilles tendon. J Anat 210, 17.Google Scholar
Gasser, T.C., Gallinetti, S., Xing, X., Forsell, C., Swedenborg, J. & Roy, J. (2012). Spatial orientation of collagen fibers in the abdominal aortic aneurysm’s wall and its relation to wall mechanics. Acta Biomater 8, 30913103.Google Scholar
Ghazanfari, S., Driessen-Mol, A., Strijkers, G.J., Kanters, F.M., Baaijens, F.P. & Bouten, C.V. (2012). A comparative analysis of the collagen architecture in the carotid artery: Second harmonic generation versus diffusion tensor imaging. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 426, 5458.Google Scholar
Greenwald, S.E., Moore, J.E., Rachev, A., Kane, T.C.P. & Meister, J.J. (1997). Experimental investigation of residual strains in the artery wall. J Biomech Eng 119, 438444.Google Scholar
Halloran, B.G., Davis, V.A., McManus, B.M., Lynch, T.G. & Baxter, B.T. (1995). Localization of aortic disease is associated with intrinsic differences in aortic structure. J Surg Res 59, 1722.Google Scholar
Hellenthal, F.A., Geenen, I.L., Teijink, J.A., Heeneman, S. & Shurink, G.W. (2009). Histological features of human abdominal aortic aneurysm are not related to clinical characteristics. Cardiovasc Pathol 18, 286293.Google Scholar
Hill, M.R., Duan, X., Gibson, G.A., Watkins, S. & Robertson, A.M. (2012). A theoretical and non-destructive experimental approach for direct inclusion of measured collagen orientation and recruitment into mechanical models of the artery wall. J Biomech 45, 762771.Google Scholar
Humphrey, J.D. & Rajagopal, K.R. (2002). A constrained mixture model for growth and remodelling of soft tissues. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 12, 407430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horny, L., Adamek, T., Gultová, E., Zitný, R., Vesely, J., Chlup, H. & Konvickova, S. (2011). Correlations between age, prestrain, diameter and atherosclerosis in the male abdominal aorta. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 4, 21282132.Google Scholar
Horny, L, Adamek, T., Vesely, J., Chlup, H., Zitny, R. & Konvickova, S. (2012). Age-related distribution of longitudinal pre-strain in abdominal aorta with emphasis on forensic application. Forens Sci Int 214, 1822.Google Scholar
Iglesias, J.C.A., Gomes, O., de Fonseca, M. & Piciornik, S. (2011). Automatic recognition of hematite grains under polarized reflected light microscopy through image analysis. Minerals Eng 24, 12641270.Google Scholar
Junqueira, L.C.U., Bignolas, G. & Bretani, R.R. (1979). Picrosirius staining plus polarization microscopy a specific method for collagen detection in tissue sections. Histochem J 11, 447455.Google Scholar
Kiraly, K., Hyttinen, M.M., Lapveteläinen, T., Elo, M., Kiviranta, I., Dobai, J., Modis, L., Helminen, H.J. & Arokoski, J.P. (1997). Specimen preparation and quantification of collagen birefringence in unstained section of articular cartilage using image analysis and polarizing light microscopy. Hystochem J 29, 317327.Google Scholar
Levene, C.I. & Poole, J.C.F. (1962). The collagen content of the normal and atherosclerotic human aortic intima. Br J Exp Pathol 43, 469471.Google Scholar
Mori, S. & Zhang, J. (2006). Principles of diffusion tensor imaging and its applications to basic neuroscience research. Neuron 51, 527539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morton, L.F. & Barnes, M.J. (1982). Collagen polymorphism in the normal and diseased blood vessel wall. Investigation of collagens types I, III and V. Atherosclerosis 42, 4151.Google Scholar
Nieminem, M.T., Rieppo, J., Töyäs, J., Hakumäki, J.M., Silvennoinen, J., Hyttinen, M.K., Helminen, H.J. & Jurvelin, J.S. (2001). T2 relaxation reveals spatial collagen architecture in articular cartilage: A comparative quantitative MRI and polarized light microscopic study. Magn Reson Med 46, 487493.Google Scholar
Ortmann, R. (1975). Use of polarized light for quantitative determination of the adjustment of the tangential fibers in articular cartilage. Anat Emebryol 148, 102120.Google Scholar
Pickering, J.G. & Boughner, D.R. (1991). Quantitative assessment of the age of fibrotic lesions using polarized light microscopy and digital image analysis. Am J Path 138, 12251231.Google Scholar
Polzer, S., Gasser, T.C., Forsell, C., Druckmüllerova, H., Tichy, M., Staffa, R., Vlachovsky, R. & Bursa, J. (2013). Automatic identification and validation of planar collagen organization in the aorta wall with application to abdominal aortic aneurysm. Microsc Microanal 19, 110.Google Scholar
Polzer, S., Gasser, T.C., Novak, K., Man, V., Tichy, M., Skacel, P. & Bursa, J. (2015). Structure-based constitutive model can accurately predict planar biaxial properties of aortic wall tissue. Acta Biomater 14, 133145.Google Scholar
Pratt, W.K. (2007). Digital Image Processing: PIKS Scientific Inside. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
Puchtler, H., Waldrop, F.S. & Valentine, L.S. (1973). Polarization microscopic studies of connective tissue stained with picro-sirius red FBA. Beitr Path 150, 174187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Retamoso, L.B, Montagner, F., Camargo, E.S., Vitral, R.W. & Tanaka, O.M. (2010). Polarized light microscopic analysis of bone formation after inhibition of cyclooxygenase 1 and 2. Anat Rec 293, 195199.Google Scholar
Reuze, P., Coatrieux, J., Luo, L. & Dillenseger, J. (1993). A 3D moment based approach for blood vessel detection and quantification in MRA. Technol Health Care 1, 181188.Google Scholar
Rezakhaniha, R., Agianniotis, A., Schrauwen, J.T., Griffa, A., Sage, D., Bouten, C.V., van de Vosse, F.N., Unser, M. & Stergiopulos, N. (2011). Experimental investigation of collagen waviness and orientation in the arterial adventitia using confocal laser scanning microscopy. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 11, 461473.Google Scholar
Rieppo, J., Hallikainen, J., Jurvelin, J.S., Kiviranta, I., Helminen, H.J. & Hyttinen, M.M. (2008). Practical considerations in the use polarized light microscopy in the analysis of the collagen network in articular cartilage. Microsc Res Tech 71, 279287.Google Scholar
Rich, L. & Whittaker, P. (2005). Collagen and picrosirious red staining: A polarized light assessment of fibrillar hue and spatial distribution. Braz J Morphol Sci 22, 97104.Google Scholar
Sacks, M.S., Smith, B.D. & Hiester, E.D. (1997). A small angle light scattering device for planar connective tissue microstructural analysis. Ann Biomed Eng 25, 678689.Google Scholar
Schrauwen, J.T.C., Vilanova, A., Rezakhaniha, R., Stergiopulos, N., van de Vosse, F.N. & Bovendeerd, P.H.M. (2012). A method for the quantification of the pressure dependent 3D collagen configuration in the arterial adventitia. J Struc Biol 180, 335342.Google Scholar
Schriefl, A.J., Reinisch, A.J., Sethuraman, S., Pierce, D.M. & Holzapfel, G.A. (2012a). Quantitative assessment of collagen fiber orientations from two-diemensional images of soft biological tissues. J R Soc Interface 9, 30813093.Google Scholar
Schriefl, A.J., Zeindlinger, G., Pierce, D.M., Regitnig, P. & Holzapfel, G.A. (2012b). Determination of the layer-specific distributed collagen fiber orientations in human thoracic and abdominal aortas and common iliac arteries. J R Soc Interface 9, 12751286.Google Scholar
Smith, J.H.F., Canham, P.B. & Starkey, J. (1981). Orientation of collagen in tunica adventitia of the human cerebral artery measured with polarized light and the universal stage. J Ultrastruct Res 77, 133145.Google Scholar
Timmins, L.H., Wu, Q., Yer, A.T., Moore, J.E. & Greenwald, S.E. (2010). Structural inhomogeneity and fiber orientation in the inner arterial media. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 298, 15371545.Google Scholar
Tower, T.T., Neidert, M.R. & Tranquillo, R.T. (2002). Fiber alignment imaging during mechanical testing of soft tissues. Ann Biomed Eng 30, 12211233.Google Scholar
Tsamis, A., Phillippi, J.A., Koch, R.G., Pasta, S., D’Amore, A., Watkins, S.C., Wagner, W.R., Gleason, T.G. & Vorp, D.A. (2013). Fiber micro-architecture in the longitudinal-radial and circumferential-radial planes of ascending thoracic aneurysm media. J Biomech 46, 27872794.Google Scholar
Vaitkevicous, P.V., Fleg, J.L., O´Connor, F.C., Wright, J.G., Lakatta, L.E., Yin, F.C. & Lakatta, E.G. (1993). Effects of age and aerobic capacity on arterial stiffness in healthy adults. Circulation 88, 14561462.Google Scholar
Willians, R.M., Zipfel, W.R. & Webb, W.W. (2005). Interpreting second-harmonic generation images of collagen I fibrils. Biophys J 88, 13771386.Google Scholar
Wolman, M. & Gillman, T. (1972). A polarized light study of collagen in dermal wound healing. Br J Exp Pathol 53, 8589.Google Scholar