Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:36:40.154Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analysis of DNA Levels During Gonomery in Early Cleavage Divisions of the Freshwater Copepod Mesocyclops Edax

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

E.M. Rasch
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, 37614
G.A. Wyngaard
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA22807.
Get access

Extract

Gonomery, the separate grouping of maternal and paternal chromosomes during the first few mitoses following fertilization (Fig. 1) and chromatin diminution, the fragmentation and elimination of whole chromosome regions during specific stages of early cleavage in all primordial cells of the soma, occur in several species of copepods, ascarid nematodes, ciliated protozoa, Japanese hagfish 9 and a few other invertebrates. Because of the marked loss of DNA from all presumptive somatic cells by selective chromatin diminution during the 4th cleavage division in M. edax, it was of interest to determine DNA levels in chromosomes during gonomery in anaphases preceding diminution (Fig. 1). It was also important to estimate the DNA content of sperm as an index of the relative contribution by the male genome at fertilization in this species.

Mature males and egg-carrying females were fixed in 3:1 methanol/acetic acid for 3-5 mins, swollen in 45% acetic acid for 2-3 mins, squashed, frozen in liquid N2 for coverslip removal, thawed in 2 changes of absolute ETOH and air dried.

Type
Developmental and Reproductive Biology
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Beermann, S., Chromosoma 60(1977)297.10.1007/BF00292858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Boveri, Th., Anat. Anz. 2(1887)688.Google Scholar
3.Chinnappa, C.C., Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 22(1980)427.10.1139/g80-053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Coyne, R., Ann. Rev. Genet. 30(1997)557.10.1146/annurev.genet.30.1.557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Hacker, V., Arch, mikro. Anat. 46(1895)579.10.1007/BF02906666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Goday, C.and Pimpnelli, S., Protozoology Today 9(1993)319.Google Scholar
7.Grishanin, A.K.et al., Russian J. Genet. 32(1996)424.Google Scholar
8.Muller, F.et al., BioEssays 18(1996)133.10.1002/bies.950180209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Nakai, Y.et al., Chrom. Res. 3(1995)321.10.1007/BF00713071CrossRefGoogle Scholar