Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T22:39:05.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Alpha-Null Defocus: an Optimum Defocus Condition with Relevance for Focal-Series Reconstruction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

Michael A. O’Keefe
Michael A. O’Keefe*
Affiliation:
National Center for Electron Microscopy, LBNL B72, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA
Get access

Abstract

Two optimum defocus conditions are well known to users of high-resolution transmission electron microscopes. Scherzer defocus is useful in high-resolution electron microscopy (HREM) because it produces an image of the specimen “projected potential” to the resolution of the microscope. Lichte defocus is useful in electron holography because it optimizes sampling in frequency-space by minimizing the slope of the microscope objective lens phase change out to the highest spatial frequency in the hologram, consequently minimizing dispersion. For focal-series reconstruction, the requirement to maximize transfer into the image of high-frequency diffracted beam amplitudes leads to a third optimum defocus condition.

Image reconstruction methods allow the achievement of super-resolution - resolution beyond the native (Scherzer) resolution of the microscope - by correction of the phase changes introduced by the microscope objective lens. One such method is focal-series reconstruction, in which diffracted-beam information obtained at several different focus values is combined. to produce a valid super-resolution result, it is necessary to ensure that every spatial frequency is represented appropriately. Suitable choice of an optimum defocus produces optimum transfer of diffracted-beam amplitudes at any chosen spatial frequency.

Type
TEM Instrument Development (Organized by D. Smith and L. Allard)
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 7 , Issue S2: Proceedings: Microscopy & Microanalysis 2001, Microscopy Society of America 59th Annual Meeting, Microbeam Analysis Society 35th Annual Meeting, Long Beach, California August 5-9, 2001 , August 2001 , pp. 916 - 917
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Scherzer, O., J. Appl. Phys. 20 (1949) 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2. Cowley, J.M., and Iijima, S., Z. Naturforsch. 27a (1972) 445–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3. Lichte, H., Ultramicroscopy 38 (1991) 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4. O'Keefe, Michael A.et al., Ultramicroscopy (2001) submitted.Google Scholar

5. O'Keefe, M.A., R&D Magazine (1999) http://www.rdmag.com/archives/basics/10microscopv.htmGoogle Scholar

6. Coene, W.M.J., Thust, A., Op de Beeck, M. and Van Dyck, D., Ultramicroscopy 64 (1996) 109–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7. O'Keefe, M.A., Ultramicroscopy 47 (1992) 282–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8. Jan-Olle, Malm and O'Keefe, Michael A., in 51st Ann Proc. MSA, Cincinnatti, Ohio (1993) 974–975.Google Scholar

9. O'Keefe, M.A. and Pitt, A. J., Electron Microscopy 1980, The Hague, Netherlands, 122–123.Google Scholar

10. Wang, Y.C.et al., 57th Ann. Proc. MSA, Portland, Oregon (1999) 822–823.Google Scholar

11. O'Keefe, M.A., in 58th Ann. Proc. MSA, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (2000) 1036–1037.Google Scholar

12. Work supported by Director, Office of Science — through the Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Material Sciences Division, of the U.S. Department of Energy, under contract No. DE-AC03-76SF00098.Google Scholar