Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T04:09:26.102Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

AFM and Fractal Analysis of Biomaterial Microtopography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

S. Jo
Affiliation:
Purdue University, School of Pharmacy, West Lafayette, IN, 47907
T. Li
Affiliation:
Purdue University, School of Pharmacy, West Lafayette, IN, 47907
K. Park
Affiliation:
Purdue University, School of Pharmacy, West Lafayette, IN, 47907
Get access

Extract

Although significant advances have been made in the development of biocompatible materials, currently available biomaterials still present a number of problems for in vivo applications. One of the attempts to improve the biocompatibility, especially blood-compatibility, of biomaterials has been surface modification. Typically, poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), albumin, heparin, and phospholipid molecules are grafted to the surface to prevent protein adsorption and cell adhesion. We have been modifying biomaterial surfaces by covalent grafting of PEG and albumin. The control and modified surfaces were examined using an atomic force microscope (AFM). In this study, we examined the surface topography changes by surface modification using PEO grafting to glass as a model system.

Glass surfaces were modified with PEO using (N-triethoxysilylpropyl)-Omonomethoxy PEG urethane (PEG-Si), a PEG derivative containing a hydrophobic carbon chain and triethoxysilyl group at one end of the PEG chain. The presence of the hydrophobic carbon chain allowed self-assembly on the surface and triethoxysilyl resulted in covalent bonding to glass surfaces

Type
Biomaterials
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Dubuc, B., Quiniou, J.F., Roques-Carmes, CTricot, C, and Zucker, S.W.: Evaluating the fractal dimension of profiles, Physical Review A, 39: 15001512, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Dubuc, B. and Dubuc, S.: Error bounds on the estimation of fractal dimension, SIAM J. Number. Anal., 33: 602626, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar