Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T12:17:58.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Use of Confocal Imaging for Arthropod Morphological Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

Angela V. Klaus
Affiliation:
American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY10024
Varuni L. Kulasekera
Affiliation:
interdepartmental Laboratories, New York, NY10024
Norman Platnick
Affiliation:
interdepartmental Laboratories, New York, NY10024
Get access

Extract

Morphological studies in spider and insect groups (Phylum Arthropoda) have historically relied upon traditional imaging techniques such as light microscopy (LM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). It has often been difficult, however, to examine some structural details of certain specimens due to limitations of the techniques. Light microscopy does not always provide adequate depth of focus for visualizing the true three-dimensional structure of a specimen, and out-of-focus light in the image can obscure detail. SEM is not applicable if the specimen is too delicate to undergo critical point drying. Additionally, SEM is a surface technique and does not provide any information about internal structure.

If a specimen is transparent to light, information about the morphology of internal structures, and connections between structures, can easily be obtained using confocal microscopy without the problems associated with traditional LM. In this study, we used confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) to study the morphology of chitinous arthropod structures by taking advantage of their autofluorescent properties.

Type
Confocal Microscopy
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References:

1.Giovanni-Galizia, C. et al. A digital three-dimensional atlas of the honeybee antennal lobe based on optical sections acquired by confocal microscopy. Cell and Tissue Res. (1999) 295: 383394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Galassi, D.M., et al. Integumental morphology in Copepods: Assessment by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Fragmenta entomologica, Roma, (1998) 30(1): 7992.Google Scholar