Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T03:22:56.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

STEM Observation and EELS Analysis of Dopant and Catalyst Particles in Carbon Nanotubes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

X. Fan ,
E.C. Dickey ,
A.A. Puretzky ,
D.B. Geohegan  and
S.J. Pennycook
X. Fan
Affiliation:
Solid State Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN37831 Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, KY40506
E.C. Dickey
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, KY40506
A.A. Puretzky
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN37996
D.B. Geohegan
Affiliation:
Solid State Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN37831
S.J. Pennycook
Affiliation:
Solid State Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN37831
Get access

Extract

Doping carbon nanotubes with either electron donors or acceptors can improve their electrical conductivity [1-2]. In order to fully understand the doping mechanisms and the corresponding changes in the electronic properties, it is essential to reveal the spatial distribution of the dopants within the carbon nanotubes. In this study we have investigated both iodine- and bromine-doped single wall carbon nanotubes(SWNT) by Z-contrast scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM). The SWNT bundles were made by arc-discharge method and doped with either molten iodine or bromine vapor. Both iodine and bromine were incorporated linearly within the nanotube bundles as shown in Fig. l and Fig.2 respectively. Higher resolution images of iodine doped nanotubes reveals that two iodine atomic chains are inside each individual SWNT as shown in Fig. lc. This unexpected result is contrary to the common belief that dopants can only enter interstitial site of the SWNT bundles.

Type
Sir John Meurig Thomas Symposium: Microscopy and Microanalysis in the Chemical Sciences
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 6 , Issue S2: Proceedings: Microscopy & Microanalysis 2000, Microscopy Society of America 58th Annual Meeting, Microbeam Analysis Society 34th Annual Meeting, Microscopical Society of Canada/Societe de Microscopie de Canada 27th Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania August 13-17, 2000 , August 2000 , pp. 48 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Lee, R.S., Kim, H.J., Fischer, J.E., Thess, A. and Smalley, R. E., Nature 388, 255 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Rao, A.M., Eklund, P.C., Bandow, S., Thess, A., and Smalley, R.E., Nature 388, 257 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Fan, X., Dickey, E. C., Ecklund, P., Williams, K., Grigorian, L., Buczko, R., Pantelides, S. T. and Pennycook, S. J., Phys. Rev. Lett, submitted. (1999)Google Scholar
4.Puretzky, A. A., Geohegan, D. B., Fan, X. and Pennycook, S. J., Applied Physics Letters, 76, (2), pp. 182–184, (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. This research was sponsored by the NSF-MRSEC Advanced Carbon Materials Center under grant No. DMR- 9809686, and by the Division of Materials Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy, under contract DE-AC05- 96OR22464 with Lockheed Martin Energy Research Corp and the Laboratory-Directed Research and Development Program at ORNL.and by an appointment to the ORNL postdoctoral research program administered jointly by ORNL and ORISE.Google Scholar