Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T18:32:02.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some Electric Field Effects in the Microbeam Analysis of Insulators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

J. Cazaux
Affiliation:
DTI, CNRS UMR 6107, UFR Sciences, BP 1039, 51687, Reims, Cedex 2, France.
M. Belhaj
Affiliation:
DTI, CNRS UMR 6107, UFR Sciences, BP 1039, 51687, Reims, Cedex 2, France.
O. Jbara
Affiliation:
DTI, CNRS UMR 6107, UFR Sciences, BP 1039, 51687, Reims, Cedex 2, France.
G. Remond
Affiliation:
ANRT, G8, 41 bvd des Capucines, 75116, Paris, France.
S. Odof
Affiliation:
DTI, CNRS UMR 6107, UFR Sciences, BP 1039, 51687, Reims, Cedex 2, France.
Get access

Abstract

Mechanisms in electrostatic charging of insulating materials during electron irradiation are very difficult to predict because they involve cross-correlated parameters: the surface potential, Vs and the secondary electron yield,δ, for bare specimens; the possible change of the bulk composition induced by the internal electric field for ground coated specimens. A better understanding of these mechanisms requires efforts from both the theoretical and the experimental points of view.

From the theoretical point of view, a two-layer model for distribution of the trapped charges (Q+ over the escape depth of the secondaries, s; Q over the maximum penetration depth R of the incident electrons) often permits to account for many charging effects observed on bare specimens. For instance, the failure of the total yield approach may be partly explained by the fact that the charge distribution expected at the critical energy Ec2 (where δ+ η=l) corresponds to Q+=‐Q but also to R ≫ s at the early beginning of the SEM and EDS investigation.

Type
Quantitative X-Ray Microanalysis in the Microprobe, in the SEM and in The ESEM:Theory and Practice (Organized by R. Gauvin and E. Lifshin)
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Cazaux, J., J. Appl. Phys. 85 (1999) 1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Cazaux, J., J. Electr. Spectrosc. Rel. Phen. 105 (1999) 155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Stokes, D.J. et al, Scanning, 22 (2000) 357CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Griffin, B.J., Microsc. Microanal. 3 (s2)(1997) 1197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Remond, G. et al, Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser., 165, (2000) 269Google Scholar
6.Phillips, M.R. et al, Microsc. Microanal., 6 (s2) (2000) 786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Autefage, F., Couderc, J.J., Bull. Mineralogie 103(1980) 623CrossRefGoogle Scholar