Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:40:50.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SEM and EDS Characterization of Palladium Cathodes After Electrolysis in Light and Heavy Water

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

D. Silver
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Portland State University, P. O. Box 751, Portland, Oregon97207
J. Dash
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Portland State University, P. O. Box 751, Portland, Oregon97207
Get access

Extract

Studies of Pd foil cathodes have indicated that when electrolyzed for long times in electrolytes containing both deuterium and hydrogen ions along with sulfuric acid, the cathodes undergo compositional, topographical, evolutionary, and isotopic changes. The results reported here describe the changes which are produced in Pd cathodes after only a few minutes of electrolysis.

In June 1993 a cold-rolled, Pd (AESAR lot #12E06) cathode of 40μm thickness was submerged at one end into an electrolyte containing 20 ml D2O and 3.5 ml H2SO4 and electrolyzed for six minutes at about 0.6 A/cm2 and 3.65 V. An identical Pd cathode (cut from the same strip) was submerged at one end into an electrolyte containing 20 ml H2O and 3.5 H2SO4 and electrolyzed for six minutes using 0.6 A/cm2 and 4.11 V. A Pt foil acted as the anode in each case. The two cells were connected in series. An ionic current flowed between the electrodes for each system as the voltages were applied.

Type
Mas Celebrates: Fifty Years of Electron Probe Microanalysis
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Dash, J., Noble, G., and Diman, D., Transactions Fusion Tech. 26(1994)299.Google Scholar
2.Silver, D., Dash, J., and Keefe, P., Fusion Tech. 24(1993)423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Dash, J., Kopecek, R., and Miguet, S., Proc. 32nd Inter society Energy Conversion Engineering Conf. 2, (1997)1350.Google Scholar
4.Silver, D. and Dash, J., Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on ColdFusion, Vancouver, Canada (1998)351.Google Scholar
5.Dash, J., Proc. 6th Int. Conf. On ColdFusion, 2(1996)477.Google Scholar
6.Silver, D., Ph.D. Dissertation, Portland State University (1997).Google Scholar
7. This research was supported with funds provided by Mr. and Mrs. Jerome, Drexler, the New York Community Trust, and the U.S. Army Research Office under grant number DAAG55-97-1-0357.Google Scholar