Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T08:50:18.970Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Recent Development of Cone-Beam X-Ray Microtomography at Sunyab

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

S.J. Pan
Affiliation:
AMIL, Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng., State Univ. of New York, Buffalo, NY14260USA
A. Shih
Affiliation:
AMIL, Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng., State Univ. of New York, Buffalo, NY14260USA
W.S. Liou
Affiliation:
AMIL, Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng., State Univ. of New York, Buffalo, NY14260USA
M.S. Park
Affiliation:
AMIL, Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng., State Univ. of New York, Buffalo, NY14260USA
G. Wang
Affiliation:
Dept. of Radiology, Univ. of Iowa, Iowa City, IA52242, USA
B.A. Bohne
Affiliation:
Dept. of Otolaryngology, Washington Univ. Medical School, St. Louis, MO63110, USA
S.P. Newberry
Affiliation:
CBI Labs, Box 11, S. Wescott Rd, Schenectady, NY12306, USA
H. Kim
Affiliation:
Dept. of Material Sciences and Eng., Kwangju Inst, of Science and Technology, Korea
P.C. Cheng
Affiliation:
AMIL, Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng., State Univ. of New York, Buffalo, NY14260USA
Get access

Extract

An experimental X-ray cone-beam microtomographic imaging system utilizing a generalized Feldkamp reconstruction algorithm has been developed in our laboratory. This microtomographic imaging system consists of a conventional dental X-ray source (Aztech 65, Boulder, CO), a sample position and rotation stage, an X-ray scintillation phosphor screen, and a high resolution slow scan cooled CCD camera (Kodak KAF 1400). A generalized Feldkamp cone-beam algorithm was used to perform tomographic reconstruction from cone-beam projection data. This algorithm was developed for various hardware configuration to perform reconstruction of spherical, rod-shaped and plate-like specimen.

A test sample consists of 8 glass beads (approx. 800μm in diameter) dispersed in an epoxy-filled #0 gelatin capsule. One hundred X-ray projection images were captured equal angularly (at 3.6 degree spacing) by the cooled CCD camera at a of 1317×967 (17×17mm2) pixels with 12-bit dynamic range. Figure 1 shows a 3D isosurface rendering of the test sample. The eight glass beads and trapped air bubbles (arrows) in the epoxy resin (e) are clearly visible.

Type
Computational Advances and Enabling Technologies for 3D Microscopies in Biology
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Cheng, P.C.et al., J. Scanning Microscopy. 13 (I), 1011 (1991)Google Scholar

2. Wang, G.et al., J. Scanning Microscopy. 14, 350354 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3. Wang, G.et al., IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., 12, 486496 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4. Wang, G.and Cheng, P.C., Zool. Studies 34, Supp. I. 159161 (1995)Google Scholar

5. Wang, G.et al., J. Scanning Microscopy. 14, 187193 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar