Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T13:26:22.617Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On Interfacial Microstructure Evolution in an Isothermally Exposed SiC Fiber-Reinforced Ti-17 Matrix Composite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2019

Yingwei Fan*
Affiliation:
AECC Beijing Institute of Aeronautical Materials, Beijing Key Laboratory of Aeronautical Materials Testing and Evaluation, Aviation Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Materials Testing and Evaluation, Key Laboratory of Aeronautical Materials Testing and Evaluation, Aero Engine Corporation of China, Beijing100095, China
Xiaorong Zhou
Affiliation:
School of Materials, University of Manchester, ManchesterM13 9PL, UK
*
*Author for correspondence: Yingwei Fan, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The kinetics and mechanisms of interface reactions in a unidirectional continuous SiC fiber-reinforced Ti-17 matrix composite were investigated using transmission electron microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. It was found that a reaction zone (RZ) consisting of two-layered TiC-type carbide forms at the fiber/matrix interface during fabrication of the composite. After isothermal exposure at elevated temperatures, the two-layered TiC-type carbide is inherited, and a new TiC-type carbide layer forms within the RZ after exposure at temperatures lower than 900°C, while a new Ti3C2-type carbide layer forms after exposure at 900°C. It was also observed that the growth of RZ is a diffusion-controlled and temperature-dependent process, obeying the Fick's law-based parabolic relationship and the Arrhenius equation. Two material constants, the temperature-independent rate constant k0 and activation energy Q, are determined as 31.5 × 10−4µm/s1/2 and 49.9 kJ/mol, respectively.

Type
Materials Science Applications
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bobet, JL & Masuda, C (1997). Estimation of residual stresses in SiC/Ti-15-3 composites and their relaxation during a fatigue test. J Mater Sci 32, 63576369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borg, RJ & Dienes, GJ (1988). An Introduction to Solid State Diffusion. London: Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
Campbell, FC (2012). Lightweight Materials - Understanding The Basics. Russell: ASM International.Google Scholar
Chen, JK & Beraun, JE (2000). A simple model for interfacial phase growth in metal matrix composites. Composites Part A 31, 727731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chou, TW, Kelly, A & Okura, A (1985). Fibre-reinforced metal-matrix composites. Composites 16, 187206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudek, HJ, Leucht, R, Borath, R & Ziegler, G (1990). Analytical investigations of thermal stability of the interface in an SiC-fiber reinforced Ti6Al4V alloy. Mikrochim Acta II, 137148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eremenko, VN & Velikanova, TY (1970). Phase equilibria in the Mo-TiC-Ti region of the ternary system Mo-Ti-C. Part II. Poroshk Metall 9, 5761.Google Scholar
Fan, Y & Zhou, X (2018). A study of interface reaction zone in a SiC fibre/Ti-17 composite. Micron 113, 9198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, Z, Guo, ZX & Cantor, B (1997). The kinetics and mechanism of interfacial reaction in sigma fibre-reinforced Ti MMCs. Composites Part A 28A, 131140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisk, K (2003). A revised thermodynamic description of the Ti–C system. Calphad 27, 367373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fromentin, JF, Debray, K, Petitcorps, YL, Martin, E & Quenisset, JM (1996). Interfacial zone design in titanium-matrix composites reinforced by SiC filaments. Compos Sci Technol 56, 767775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goesmann, F & Schmid-Fetzer, R (1995). Temperature-dependent interface reactions and electrical contact properties of titanium on 6H-SiC. Semicnd Sci Technol 10, 16521658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorsse, S & Petitcorps, YL (1998). A new approach in the understanding of the SiC/Ti reaction zone composition and morphology. Composites Part A 29A, 12211227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gundel, DB & Wawner, FE (1991). Interfacial reaction kinetics of coated SiC fibers with various titanium alloys. Scr Mater 25, 437441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, SQ, Kagawa, Y, Saito, H & Masuda, C (1998). Microstructural characterization of interface in SiC fiber-reinforced Ti–15V–3Cr–3Al–3Sn matrix composite. Mater Sci Eng A 246, 2535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, ZX, Derby, B & Cantor, B (1993). Comparison of interfaces in Ti composites reinforced with uncoated and TiB2/C-coated SiC fibres. J Mater Sci 169, 279287.Google Scholar
Hall, IW & Lirn, J-L (1992). Microstructural analysis of isothermally exposed Ti/SiC metal matrix composites. J Mater Sci 27, 38353842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, IW & Ni, CY (1995). Thermal stability of an SCS-6/Ti-22Al-23Nb composite. Mater Sci Eng A 192/193, 987993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansson, U & Lewin, E (2013). Sputter deposition of transition-metal carbide films — A critical review from a chemical perspective. Thin Solid Films 536, 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeng, SM, Kai, W, Shih, CJ & Yang, J-M (1989). Interface reaction studies of B4C/B and SiC/B fiber-reinforced Ti3Al matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng A 114, 189196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jin, HH, Cho, HD, Kwon, S, Shin, C & Kwon, J (2012). Modified preparation technique of TEM sample for various TEM analyses of structural materials. Mater Lett 89, 133136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerans, RJ, Mazdiyasni, KS, Ruh, R & Lipsitt, HA (1984). Solubility of metals in substoichiometric TiC1−x. J Am Ceram Soc 67, 3438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J-K, Mai, Y-W & Mai, Y-W (1998). Engineered Interfaces in Fiber Reinforced Composites. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Ltd.Google Scholar
Korzhavyi, PA, Pourovskii, LV, Hugosson, HW, Ruban, AV & Johansson, B (2002). Ab initio study of phase equilibria in TiCx. Phys Rev Lett 88, 015505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacoste, E, Arvieu, C & Quenisset, J-M (2015). Correlation between microstructures of SiC-reinforced titanium matrix composite and liquid route processing parameters. J Mater Sci 50, 55835592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J, Wang, L, Qin, J, Chen, Y, Lu, W & Zhang, D (2011). The effect of heat treatment on thermal stability of Ti matrix composite. J Alloys Compd 509, 5256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipatnikov, VN & Gusev, AI (1999). High-temperature heat capacity and order-disorder phase transformations in nonstoichiometric titanium carbide. Phys Status Solidi B 212, R11R12.3.0.CO;2-T>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipatnikov, VN, Kottar, A, Zueva, LV & Gusev, AI (2000). Ordering effects in nonstoichiometric titanium carbide. Inorg Mater 36, 206212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipatnikov, VN, Zueva, LV & Gusev, AI (1998). Disorder-order phase transformations and electrical resistivity of nonstoichiometric titanium carbide. Phys Solid State 40, 12111218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lissenden, CJ, Herakovich, CT & Pindera, MJ (1995). Response of SiC/Ti under combined loading part I: Theory and experiment for imperfect bonding. J Compos Mater 29, 130155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, X, Yang, Y, Ma, Z, Liu, C, Chen, Y & Ai, Y (2006). Kinetics and mechanism of interfacial reaction in SCS-6 SiC continuous fiber-reinforced Ti-Al intermetallic matrix composites. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 16, 7783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martineau, P, Pailler, R, Lahaye, M & Naslain, R (1984). SiC filament/titanium matrix composites regarded as model composites. Part 2. Fibre/matrix chemical interactions at high temperatures. J Mater Sci 19, 27492770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehrer, H (2007). Diffusion in Solids Fundamentals, Methods, Materials, Diffusion-Controlled Processes. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, AG (1974). Interfaces in Metal Matrix Composites. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, S, Ananth, CR & Chandra, N (1997). Effect of residual stresses on the interfacial fracture behavior of metal-matrix composites. Compos Sci Technol 57, 15011512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naka, M, Feng, JC & Schuster, JC (1997). Phase reaction and diffusion path of the SiC/Ti system. Metall Mater Trans A 28A, 13851390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ngai, TWL, Hu, CX, Zheng, W, Xie, H & Li, YY (2011). High temperature stability of SiC/Ti interface. Mater Sci Forum 685, 340344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okamoto, H (1998). C-Ti (carbon-titanium). J Phase Equilib 19, 89.Google Scholar
Park, YH, Narayen, D & Marcus, HL (1984). Interface diffusion studies in composites of continuous SiC and B4C-B fibers in a titanium metal matrix. Mater Sci Eng A 67, 7989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, DVS, Muraleedharan, K & Humphreys, CJ (2010). TEM specimen preparation techniques. In Microscopy: Science, Technology, Applications and Education, Méndez-Vilas, A & Díaz, J (Eds.), pp. 12321244. Badajoz: Formatex Research Center.Google Scholar
Saito, T (2004). The automotive application of discontinuously reinforced TiB-Ti composites. JOM 56, 3336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scientific Group Thermodata Europe (SGTE). Binary (SGTE) alloy phase diagrams. Available at http://www.sgte.org/fact/documentation/BINARY/BINARY_Figs.htm (accessed 07/2014).Google Scholar
Singerman, SA & Jackson, JJ (1996). Titanium metal matrix composites for aerospace applications. In Superalloys, Kissinger, RD, Deye, DJ, Anton, DL, Cetel, AD, Nathal, MV, Pollock, TM & Woodford, DA (Eds.), pp. 579586. Anaheim: The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society.Google Scholar
Strashinskaya, LV (1971). Contact interaction of titanium carbide with titanium, zirconium and vanadium in vacuo. Fiziko-Khimieheskaya Mekhanika Materialov 7, 8385.Google Scholar
Takahashi, N, Sato, T, Nakatsuka, S, Fujiwara, K, Yoshida, K & Yokozeki, T (2012). Titanium metal matrix composite development for commercial aircraft landing gear structure. 28th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences. Brisbane, Australia, 23 August.Google Scholar
Vassel, A (1997). Interface considerations in high-temperature titanium metal matrix composites. J Mater Sci 185, 303309.Google Scholar
Warrier, SG & Lin, RY (1993). Interfacial reactions in titanium/SCS fiber composites during fabrication. Scr Mater 28, 313318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, J-M & Jeng, SM (1989a). Interfacial reaction kinetics of SiC fiber-reinforced Ti3Al matrix composites. Scr Mater 23, 15591564.Google Scholar
Yang, J-M & Jeng, SM (1989b). Interfacial reactions in titanium-matrix composites. JOM 41, 5659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, YQ & Dudek, HJ (1997). Interface stability in SCS-6 SiC/super α2 composites. Scr Mater 37, 503510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, YQ, Dudek, HJ & Kumpfert, J (1998a). Interfacial reaction and stability of SCS-6 SiC/Ti–25Al–10Nb–3V–1Mo composites. Mater Sci Eng A A246, 213220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, YQ, Dudek, HJ & Kumpfert, J (1998b). TEM investigations of the fibre/matrix interface in SCS-6 SiC/Ti–25Al–10Nb–3V–1Mo composites. Composites Part A 29A, 12351241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zalar, A, Kovac, J, Pracek, B, Panjan, P & Ceh, M (2008). Ion sputtering rates of W-, Ti- and Cr-carbides studied at different Ar+ ion incidence angles. Appl Surf Sci 254, 66116618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, G, Kang, Q, Shi, N, Li, G & Li, D (2003). Kinetics and mechanism of interfacial reaction in a SiCf/Ti composite. J Mater Sci Technol 19, 407410.Google Scholar
Zueva, LV & Gusev, AI (1999). Effect of nonstoichiometry and ordering on the period of the basis structure of cubic titanium carbide. Phys Solid State 41, 10321038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar