Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:26:02.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mapping Phosphorus In Macromolecular Assemblies At Near Single Atom Sensitivity By Stem-Eels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

R.D. Leapman
Affiliation:
Bioengineering & Physical Science Program, ORS, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD20892.
N.W. Rizzo
Affiliation:
Bioengineering & Physical Science Program, ORS, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD20892.
Get access

Extract

In principle, electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) in the scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) should be able to detect single atoms of phosphorus in biological macromolecules. Such a capability would provide a direct method for measuring the degree of phosphorylation or nucleotide binding which are important in determining the functional states of protein assemblies. Although it has already been possible to map heavy elements, e.g., uranium, at near single atom sensitivity, this has not yet been achievable for lighter atoms like phosphorus. One difficulty in imaging light atoms in a biological specimen is that there is insufficient contrast to visualize the atoms directly so, in a stationary probe analysis, it is not known where to place the probe. Identifying single phosphorus atoms therefore necessarily involves compositional mapping in which EELS information is collected pixel by pixel, a technique known as spectrum-imaging. Recently, improvements have been made in the acquisition of such images, especially the ability to correct for specimen drift in a robust fashion.

Type
Biological Microanalysis
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Isaacson, M. and Johnson, D., Ultramicroscopy 1 (1975) 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Shuman, H. and Somlyo, A.P., Ultramicroscopy 21 (1987) 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Leapman, R.D. and Andrews, S.B., J. Microsc. 165 (1992) 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Krivanek, O.L. et al., Microsc. Microanal. Microstruct. 2 (1991) 257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Jeanguillaume, C. and Colliex, C., Ultramicroscopy 28 (1989) 252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Hunt, J.A. and Williams, D.B., Ultramicroscopy 38 (1991) 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Hunt, J.A. and Harmon, R.H., Microsc. Microanal. 4 (Suppl. 2: Proceedings, pub.Springer) (1998) 152.Google Scholar
8.Leapman, R.D. and Rizzo, N.W., Ultramicroscopy (1999) in press.Google Scholar