Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:39:54.100Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Low-Energy STEM of Multilayers and Dopant Profiles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2005

P.G. Merli  and
V. Morandi
P.G. Merli
Affiliation:
Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche-Istituto per la Microeletironica e i Microsistemi, Sezione di Bologna, Via Gobetti 101, 40129 Bologna, Italy
V. Morandi
Affiliation:
Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche-Istituto per la Microeletironica e i Microsistemi, Sezione di Bologna, Via Gobetti 101, 40129 Bologna, Italy
Get access

Abstract

A conventional scanning electron microscope equipped with a LaB6 source has been modified to operate in a scanning transmission mode. Two detection strategies have been considered, one based on the direct collection of transmitted electrons, the other on the collection of secondary electrons resulting from the conversion of the transmitted ones. Two types of specimens have been mainly investigated: semiconductor multilayers and dopant profiles in As-implanted Si. The results show that the contrast obeys the rules of mass–thickness contrast whereas the resolution is always defined by the probe size independently of specimen thickness and beam broadening. The detection strategy may affect the bright field (light regions look brighter) or dark field (heavy regions look brighter) appearance of the image. Using a direct collection of the transmitted electrons, the contrast can be deduced from the angular distribution of transmitted electrons and their collection angles. When collecting the secondary electrons to explain the image contrast, it is also necessary to take into account the secondary yield dependence on the incidence angle of the transmitted electrons.

Keywords

STEMlow-energy STEMdopant profilessemiconductor multilayersSE yieldMonte Carlo simulationmass–thickness contrastelectron device investigation
Type
INSTRUMENTATION AND TECHNIQUES
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , February 2005 , pp. 97 - 104
Copyright
© 2005 Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arnal, F., Verdier, P., & Vincensini, P.D. (1969). Coefficient de retrodiffusion dans de cas d'electrons monocinetique arrivant sur la cible sous une incidende oblique. Compt Rend Acad Sci 268, 1526–1529.Google Scholar
Bongler, R., Golla, U., Kassens, M., Reimer, L., Schindler, B., Senkel, R., & Spranck, M. (1993). Electron–specimen interactions in low voltage scanning electron microscopy. Scanning 15, 1–18.Google Scholar
Joy, D.C. (1984). Beam interactions, contrast and resolution in SEM. J Microsc 136, 241–258.Google Scholar
Joy, D.C. (1987). A model for calculating secondary and backscattered electron yields. J Microsc 147, 51–64.Google Scholar
Liu, C.P., Dunin-Borkowski, R.E., Boothroyd, C.B., Brown, P.D., & Humphreys, C.J. (1997). Characterization of ultrathin doping layers in semiconductors. Microsc Microanal 3, 352–363.Google Scholar
Luo, S. & Joy, D.C. (1988). Monte Carlo calculations of secondary electron emission. Scan Microsc 2, 1901–1915.Google Scholar
Merli, P.G. & Morandi, V. (2002). On the spatial resolution and nanoscale feature visibility in scanning electron microscopy. Adv Imag Elect Phys 123, 375–397.Google Scholar
Merli, P.G., Morandi, V., & Corticelli, F. (2002). Images of dopant profiles in low-energy scanning transmission electron microscopy. Appl Phys Lett 81, 4535–4537.Google Scholar
Merli, P.G., Morandi, V., & Corticelli, F. (2003). Backscattered electron imaging and scanning transmission electron microscopy imaging of multi-layers. Ultramicroscopy 94, 89–98.Google Scholar
Pennycook, S.J. (2002). Structure determination through Z-contrast microscopy. Adv Imag Elect Phys 123, 173–206.Google Scholar
Reimer, L. (1984). Transmission Electron Microscopy. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Reimer, L. (1998). Scanning Electron Microscopy. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Reimer, L. & Drescher, H. (1977). Secondary electron emission of 10–100 keV from transparent films of Al and Au. J Phys D: Appl Phys 10, 805–815.Google Scholar
Reimer, L. & Volbert, B. (1979). Detector system for backscattered electrons by conversion to secondary electrons. Scanning 2, 238–248.Google Scholar
Shimizu, R. (1974). Secondary electron yield with primary electron beam of kilo-electron-volts. J Appl Phys 45, 2107–2112.Google Scholar
Shimizu, R. & Murata, K. (1971). Monte Carlo calculations of the electron–sample interactions in the scanning electron microscope. J Appl Phys 42, 387–394.Google Scholar
Williams, D.B. & Carter, C.B. (1996). Transmission Electron Microscopy. New York: Plenum Press.