Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T08:30:24.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interpretation of Holographic and Lorentz Images of an Array of Reverse Biased P-N Junctions in a Semi-Infinite Specimen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

M. Beleggia
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Istituto Nazionale per la Fisica della Materia, University of Bologna, viale B. Pichat 6/2, I-40127Bologna, Italy.
R. Capelli
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Istituto Nazionale per la Fisica della Materia, University of Modena, via Campi 213/A, 41100, Modena, Italy.
G. Pozzi
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Istituto Nazionale per la Fisica della Materia, University of Bologna, viale B. Pichat 6/2, I-40127Bologna, Italy.
Get access

Extract

The problem of observing reverse-biased p-n junctions by means of transmission electron microscopy techniques is very challenging both from the experimental and theoretical points of view. In particular, in addition to standard Lorentz microscopy techniques, whose image contrast is able to give some information on the region of high field, also holographic methods have been successfully applied and an interference map of the twodimensional phase on the specimen plane obtained.

In this work we consider, in particular, the theoretical and interpretative aspects, as we have improved a model for the electric field associated to a periodic array of alternating p and n stripes lying in a half plane (physically corresponding to an array of zero-width step junctions) by taking into account that the junctions are tilted with respect to the specimen edge.

Type
Electron Holography
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Merli, P.G. et al., Phys. Stat. Sol. 30 (1975) 699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Frabboni, S. et al., Ultramicroscopy 23 (1987) 29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Matteucci, G. et al, Adv. Imag. Electr. Phys. 99 (1997) 171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Capiluppi, C. et al., Microsc. Microan. Microstruct. 6 (1995) 647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Merli, P.G. and Pozzi, G., Optik 51 (1978) 39Google Scholar