Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:09:09.012Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Identification of Infectious Disease Agents: Unusual and usual Pathogens and the Diagnostic Difficulties they Present

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

CD Humphrey*
Affiliation:
Infectious Disease Pathology Activity, Division of Viral and Rickettsial Diseases, CDC, Atlanta, Ga30333
Get access

Extract

“Emergence” of infectious disease agents in humans, domestic animals and wildlife during the past 20 years has been widely described. Perception of emergence derives largely from the application of improved identification methods, including refinements in molecular, serologic, and microscopy technologies that enable researchers to monitor species migration with greater sensitivity. The reality of emergence comes from shifts in genetic profiles and from influences of ecological changes often brought about by human interventions designed for economic or quality-of-life gains, and ecologic management. CDC has frequent involvement with many outbreaks caused by various infectious disease agents, some of which may be considered emerging. Notable unusual agents include filoviruses (Fig. 1) and hantaviruses (Fig. 2). More typically encountered agents include caliciviruses (Fig. 3) and influenza viruses (Fig. 4). Recently, threats of national and international bioterrorism have added to CDC's responsibilities for prompt identification of infectious agents.

Type
Microorganisms: The Good, The Bad, The Unusual
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References:

1.Binder, S, et al., Science 284 (1999)1311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Harvell, CD et al., Science 285 (1999)1505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Daszak, P et al., Science 287 (2000) 443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Noel, JS et al., J Infect Dis 179 (1999)1334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Humphrey, CD et al., Microsc&Microanal 4 (1998)1052Google Scholar