Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T12:19:04.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gene Expression Profiling Following Instillation of Diesel Exhaust Particles in Rat Lung: A First Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

Lucy Reynolds
Affiliation:
School of Biosciences, University of Cardiff, POB 911, Cardiff, CF11 3US
Kelly BéruBé
Affiliation:
School of Biosciences, University of Cardiff, POB 911, Cardiff, CF11 3US
Timothy Jones
Affiliation:
School of Biosciences, University of Cardiff, POB 911, Cardiff, CF11 3US
Roy Richards
Affiliation:
School of Biosciences, University of Cardiff, POB 911, Cardiff, CF11 3US
Get access

Extract

Epidemiological studies conducted first in the USA and later in the UK, suggest that a relationship exists between increased cardio-respiratory hospital admissions, morbidity and mortality rates and increases in PM10 concentrations. In urban environments, ultrafine diesel exhaust particles (DEP), accounts for 20-80 % by mass of the airborne PM10 arising from vehicular activities. In previous work, we used well characterised DEP as a surrogate for PM10 and examined its bioreactivity in vivo by assessing lung permeability, inflammation and epithelial cell markers in lavage fluid. Delivery of a single instillate of l mg DEP into the rat lung was not found to cause progressive damage but did produce a transient change in lung permeability. In the experiment described here, we instilled two different doses (control [NaCl], 0.25 and 1.25 mg) of DEP into the rat lung and assessed the responses using the methods described above with the addition of a new technique known as gene expression profiling.

Type
Biological Microanalysis
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References:

1.Anderson, R. et al., Thorax, 50(1991)1188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Murphy, S. et al., Life Sci., 62(1998)1789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.BéruBé, K. et al, Atmos Environ, 33(1999)1599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Research support from the National Environmental Research Council (UK), Urgent Research Programme.Google Scholar