Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:30:55.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electron Tomography of Insect Flight Muscle in Isometric Contraction and Rigor States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

Kenneth A. Taylor*
Affiliation:
Institute of Molecular Biophysics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, 32306-4380
Get access

Abstract

Electron microscopy is a technology fully capable of bridging the light microscopic world with the world of protein structure at atomic resolution. There are numerous examples of cases where cryoelectron microscopy has been used to fit an atomic structure into a structure that has been difficult to crystallize for high resolution structure analysis. More difficult is the fitting of atomic structures into more conventionally prepared tissue like that used in freeze substitution.

We have been using electron tomography to obtain 3-D images of insect flight muscle in various states, including those produced in an active isometric contraction as well as in rigor. These tomograms were obtained using non-uniform tilt angles, cross correlation alignment, area matching and Whittaker-Shannon interpolation of the 3-D transform. The fitting of atomic structures into raw tomograms is a difficult proposition because of the relatively highly noisy feature of the images. Better results are obtained when averages are produced. We have used two method for producing averages. One of these, the so-called column average is used when the muscle filaments are relatively straight with good axial order, or can be straightened in 3-D but their lateral ordering is poor. Column averaging improved considerably reduced the noise in tomograms of contracting muscle enabling the four major crossbridge conformation to be observed (Fig. 1).

Type
Electron Tomography: Recent Advances and Applications (Organized by M. Marko)
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

references

1.Baker, T.S. and Johnson, J.E.. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 1996. 6: p. 585594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Taylor, K.A., et al. J.Struct.Biol., 1997. 120: p. 372-86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Taylor, K.A., et al.Cell, 1999. 99: p. 421431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Winkler, H. and Taylor, K.A.. Ultramicroscopy, 1996. 63: p. 125132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Frank, J. and van Heel, M.. J. Mol. Biol., 1982. 161: p. 134137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.VanHeel, M. and Frank, J.. Ultramicroscopy, 1981. 6: p. 187194.Google Scholar
7.Winkler, H. and Taylor, K.A.. Ultramicroscopy, 1999. 77: p. 141152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Chapman, M.S.Acta Crystal., 1995. A51: p. 6980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Chen, L.F., et al. J. Struct. Biol., 2001. in press.Google Scholar